jonesreport.com — Senator John Kerry was questioned about the collapse of WTC Building 7 during an appearance at Book People in Austin, Texas.Kerry responded: "I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- THAT THEY DID IT IN A CONTROLLED FASHION."
Apr 23, 2007 View in Crawl 4
911isalieApr 23, 2007
Kerry said....I don't know. You're the first person to mention this to me - LOLHe's a skull and bones piece of s**t and he knows the whole story; question should have been, do you guys ever talk about WTC7 at the Bohemian Grove, when you're worshiping Moloch (Lucifer) the ancient Babylonian deity?When you watch this clip pay attention to Kerry's body language when the interrogator mentions WTC7 by name, and Larry Silverstein specifically. If you think John Kerry doesn't know who Silverstein is your nuts. I also like how Kerry doesn't "know" much. He hasn't read the 911 report, hasn't looked at any of the evidence, just the same way he didn't read the Patriot Act or the NSA assessment (only 69 pages long) on pre-war intelligence, regarding Iraq.In a word - John Kerry, as all of these idiots, is just another stinking, weasel, liar; just like his cousin and fellow bonesman and Satanist, G.W. Bush.The problem here, in my humble opinion, is that when we get the chance to hammer on these people in a small setting, such as the one in the clip, you need to have very well honed questions and arguments; in essence, you need to pull their guard down on one thing and pound them with very specific questions; ones that could almost come across as allegations. Take the gloves off with these pieces of crap. Remember - they are liars, murderers, drug dealers, pedophiles and every other thing you can name, however, and most importantly, they are YOUR.....EMPLOYEES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Could we all remember that - they work for us/you/me...it's time for us to hold these pieces of walking fecal matter accountable. It's time for the EMPLOYERS to remind the EMPLOYEES who actually runs the show, around here.
jkeoghApr 23, 2007
The NIST WTC7 photo is fake.<a class="user" href="http://911blogger.com/node/8039">http://911blogger.com/node/8039</a>Repeat after me:Jumbo jets cannot demolish skyscrapers.The people are about to bite back.Yes, these criminals will hang.
babykitkatApr 23, 2007
He is a Boot Licker a sell out to the USA !
babykitkatApr 23, 2007
Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate I bet it is.... NOT
ronaldwieckApr 23, 2007
"Repeat after me:Jumbo jets cannot demolish skyscrapers."Repeat after me: NIST published over TEN THOUSAND pages of charts, diagrams, graphs, photos, illustrations, schematics, calculations, computer simulations, analysis, and commentary explaining how commercial airliners a) struck the buildings, severing several perimeter and core columns; b) dislodged much of the protective fireproofing (odd that indestructible steel requires protection, isn't it?); c) started extensive fires fueled by the many combustible items available. These THREE factors, taken together, led to a weakening of columns where the fireproofing was missing. Those columns eventually failed, exerting a pull on the floor trusses, which, in turn, pulled the exterior columns inward. The inward bowing of the exterior columns, OBSERVABLE IN MOST PHOTOS OF WTC 1 and 2, demonstrates the validity of NIST's conclusions. You have read absolutely nothing on the subject that hasn't been fabricated by ignoramuses on fantasy sites. Understandably, you wouldn't dream of trying NIST NCSTAR 1, so why not look at the FAQ? It's only a few pages and you might be able to comprehend some of it."The people are about to bite back.Yes, these criminals will hang."No, most of the "people" do not belong to a deranged lynch mob determined to punish innocent members of the U.S. government. Your insane and pernicious fantasy is contradicted by ALL available evidence. A movement based entirely on hatred and stupidity can't destroy this great nation.
bryanth798May 4, 2007
It seems like no pro-government posters are available to argue their case. I have a feeling that there is no one left in this country who believes their lies anymore except for the shrinking bunch of boneheads who cling to the scraps of blather that Bill O'Reilly offers them.
Closed AccountJun 14, 2007
@btbalance sayeth: his title is bs... John Kerry DID NOT say WTC7 was a controlled demolition.. he clearly doesn't know what he's talking about.. he's probably thinking of the WTC6, which was brought down..Perhaps Kerry was confused; we'll benefit him some doubt 'cuz even tho' he's one of them Bonezdudes, he still ain't the firmest tomato in that batch o' ketchup.Larry Silverstein however DID clearly admit to sanctioning the DEMOLITION of WTC7 with his admission that they decided to "pull" the building.So Kerry was either ignorant at the time, or he was LYING. As he's a politician/Bush cousin/Sachs-Coburg-Goethe cousin, I think the latter is the most likely.
wolfdeckAug 17, 2007
There's a header that reads, "Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate". Duh! I watched the video. Am I being warned that Kerry's voice was doctored? Mind you! I failed to watch his lips move to try and verify that the words were in sync with the facial movements! Mind you! Hard to believe that Kerry is really this far out-of-sync with common knowledge out of pure ignorance...