sptimes.com — "With the Internet activist group Anonymous threatening a second round of protests against Scientology this weekend, the Clearwater-based church went to court late Tuesday, filing a petition for a temporary restraining order."
Mar 12, 2008 View in Crawl 4
halfangMar 12, 2008
Oh sir, can you show me your anonymous membership card?I told you I'm not member of anonymous!
Closed AccountMar 13, 2008
"Harney said the church has documented threats made by members of Anonymous, and provided those threats to Clearwater police."...but these are REAL documented threats this time, not like all those other documented threats which turned out to be forgeries created by members of Scientology to ruin the lives of those who spoke out.I'm sorry, but how many times do we let someone cry wolf before we stop listening to them?
bdbthinkerMar 13, 2008
lolwut?take a min and educate yourself on their Fair Game policy.<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology)">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientolog ...</a>
nairanvacMar 13, 2008
IT'S OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAND!!!!11!!!uno!
monk22Mar 13, 2008
but your right end where mine begin and that sounds like a condition to me
detonateMar 13, 2008
Buddhism is definitely the best religion... If I were religious it would be the one I'd go for...
bing11Apr 13, 2008
I noticed that Mejari and likewhateeever never explained how "Anonymous" attacks weren't illegal, instead trying to turn this into a "ElAssoWipo called me a child rapist!" thread. Good work to these two, for blindly buying into the bandwagon bulls**t, while simultaneously pointing a finger saying "Scientologists are bandwagoners."Also, good work you two on making up Scientology doctrine so you can completely take it out of context or flat out LIE about it.For anyone else looking for the truth, and don't trust WhatIsScientology.com, try: scientologymyths.info
bing11Apr 13, 2008
Do you pretend Anonymous has commit no crimes then? No illegal hacking and stealing of documents? No DOS attacks? No harrassments? Do you expect me to believe that none of those happened?If you admit that a few members of Anonymous HAVE done stupid, illegal things, but claim it does not mean Anonymous as a whole is wrong, then why does that rule not apply to Scientology? A few ex-members, decades ago, did some stupid, illegal things. Now every Scientologist is wrong from now on?Sorry, I don't buy into your double-stand hypocritical bulls**t.