Of course these comments are sacastic intended to point out the strength of Sarah Palin's lerdership.We all support Palin as the best thing since Ronald Regan to happen for the benefit of the nation and the Republican Party.Go Sarah!!
HughRoss: You have set the cause for Women's Rights and Equality back at least 100 years. Nevertheless, there is much to admire about both candidates. This is a historic race and I have only good will toward both candiates.
I have set the cause for Wome's Rights and Equality back 100 years? How in the world could I accomplish that? Because I said she governs on the curves of emotion (using political power to settle personal vendettas)? Never once did I say that she isn't qualified because she is a women, nor did I allude to her being unelectable because of her gender.The fact that rabblerousers for McCain say whomever attacks Palin is sexist is absolutely ridiculous. It seems anybody who is honestly thinking about voting for Palin --even in light of her *actual* scandalous behavior (not like the no-watered attacks tossed at Obama)--are doing so just because of her gender. If McCain picked Palin just because of her gender (which, as it appears he did), seems like a high-handed slap to the face for all the Hillary supporters out there. And to imply that *I* alone set women's rights back is completely unfounded. To give the impression that I am sexist because of the *FACTS* I presented about Palin's long-standing record of High-Minded infallibility is ludicrous.
"What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?" "One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy." "The other kills her own food."
trolleyfanSep 3, 2008
Yes, I am serious. If you can look at all the evidence of the world...and see a magic sky guy in it...you are delusional. Period.
mxidreamteamSep 5, 2008
Of course these comments are sacastic intended to point out the strength of Sarah Palin's lerdership.We all support Palin as the best thing since Ronald Regan to happen for the benefit of the nation and the Republican Party.Go Sarah!!
mxidreamteamSep 5, 2008
HughRoss: You have set the cause for Women's Rights and Equality back at least 100 years. Nevertheless, there is much to admire about both candidates. This is a historic race and I have only good will toward both candiates.
hughrussSep 5, 2008
I have set the cause for Wome's Rights and Equality back 100 years? How in the world could I accomplish that? Because I said she governs on the curves of emotion (using political power to settle personal vendettas)? Never once did I say that she isn't qualified because she is a women, nor did I allude to her being unelectable because of her gender.The fact that rabblerousers for McCain say whomever attacks Palin is sexist is absolutely ridiculous. It seems anybody who is honestly thinking about voting for Palin --even in light of her *actual* scandalous behavior (not like the no-watered attacks tossed at Obama)--are doing so just because of her gender. If McCain picked Palin just because of her gender (which, as it appears he did), seems like a high-handed slap to the face for all the Hillary supporters out there. And to imply that *I* alone set women's rights back is completely unfounded. To give the impression that I am sexist because of the *FACTS* I presented about Palin's long-standing record of High-Minded infallibility is ludicrous.
networthbrokersSep 5, 2008
"What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?" "One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy." "The other kills her own food."