Warming; Cooling. Whatever.What I want to see is all the eco-fascist whackjobs who cannot tell the difference between weather and climate who were yipping and yowling at the beginning of the year about how last year's hurricane season was just an appetizer compared to how bad this year's was going to be.So, tell me again how badly this year's hurricane season is going?
OK, got it, thanks.You can have a consensus providing you ignore those scientists who have opinions you don't like. Hmmm. Wait. Isn't that what the Global Warming crowd is already doing? Yes it is. So, nothing new. Got it.
"Khabibullo Abdusamatov expects a repeat of the period known as the Little Ice Age. During the 16th century, the Baltic Sea froze so hard that hotels were built on the ice for people crossing the sea in coaches."Hotels and coaches... in the 16th century? :O
Recently I searched Digg for articles on "Global warming" then on "Global cooling", overwhelmingly there were 30 pages for the first and only 4 articles for the later.... Wow. Does this mean that there are 30 times the scientists on the warming side of the debate? Does it mean that there are 30 times hotter then cooler days? Does it mean that the people who subscribe to Digg are sheep? Unfortunately, my logic is about as good as the logic use in promoting global warming as a concept. I personally conclude from this unscientific exercise that 30 times as many people subscribing to Digg are sheep. How to I come to this hypothesis? First: Some one has to write and post some trivia on "Global warming" at a rate much higher then those writing otherwise, Secondly someone has to read and suggest the article from the "internet available press" that means a much higher number of these folks have to find these articles. Then folks on Digg have to click on the "digg" symbol to actually have it appear in front of me. Now all along the line more persons had to act in more abundance then those that would act in the relation to articles on "global Cooling".So as I have read articles on "global Cooling" within the "internet press" I would have to conclude that others do, as well. And I, being rational do not find it to compelling to suggest these articles for Digg. But if they were on Digg I would not feel compelled to click on the "Digg" button in order to have balance. And why? because I feel the "Diggers" on Digg are sheep and I would not want to succumb to the wrath of the herd. For I have seen what the wrath can met. For when, the herd stampedes to an end, all in its way must "look out" for nothing can save one. But what is most fearful is that most of these sheep also will vote for Obama this fall and will not need "Global warming" as their mantra anymore. So indeed, Obama has saved the world and all it's inhabitances, now we can move on to the bigger fear of what's next? Socialism Rocks!
Apparently in right wing world, the study from one scientist from Russia is all it takes to dispute the conclusions of the National Academy of Sciences.
herolintAug 26, 2006
This just goes to show that at least some scientists are willing to use their training for more than political grandstanding.
Closed AccountAug 26, 2006
Warming; Cooling. Whatever.What I want to see is all the eco-fascist whackjobs who cannot tell the difference between weather and climate who were yipping and yowling at the beginning of the year about how last year's hurricane season was just an appetizer compared to how bad this year's was going to be.So, tell me again how badly this year's hurricane season is going?
rebradAug 26, 2006
I'm so confused. Which is it? Cold or Hot? What does Al say? You can't trust those Commie Bastards. Is this another inconvenient truth?
vikingcoderAug 27, 2006
Please tell me how natural cycles prevent makind from affecting the balance.
damavAug 27, 2006
OK, got it, thanks.You can have a consensus providing you ignore those scientists who have opinions you don't like. Hmmm. Wait. Isn't that what the Global Warming crowd is already doing? Yes it is. So, nothing new. Got it.
damavAug 27, 2006
Send that to Al Gore
finalplayerAug 28, 2006
"Khabibullo Abdusamatov expects a repeat of the period known as the Little Ice Age. During the 16th century, the Baltic Sea froze so hard that hotels were built on the ice for people crossing the sea in coaches."Hotels and coaches... in the 16th century? :O
clearzAug 28, 2006
In Soviet Russia, Global cooling owns you.
frankinlaAug 30, 2006
would this be a good time to mention Steorn? /Sarcasm
luckbearOct 20, 2008
Recently I searched Digg for articles on "Global warming" then on "Global cooling", overwhelmingly there were 30 pages for the first and only 4 articles for the later.... Wow. Does this mean that there are 30 times the scientists on the warming side of the debate? Does it mean that there are 30 times hotter then cooler days? Does it mean that the people who subscribe to Digg are sheep? Unfortunately, my logic is about as good as the logic use in promoting global warming as a concept. I personally conclude from this unscientific exercise that 30 times as many people subscribing to Digg are sheep. How to I come to this hypothesis? First: Some one has to write and post some trivia on "Global warming" at a rate much higher then those writing otherwise, Secondly someone has to read and suggest the article from the "internet available press" that means a much higher number of these folks have to find these articles. Then folks on Digg have to click on the "digg" symbol to actually have it appear in front of me. Now all along the line more persons had to act in more abundance then those that would act in the relation to articles on "global Cooling".So as I have read articles on "global Cooling" within the "internet press" I would have to conclude that others do, as well. And I, being rational do not find it to compelling to suggest these articles for Digg. But if they were on Digg I would not feel compelled to click on the "Digg" button in order to have balance. And why? because I feel the "Diggers" on Digg are sheep and I would not want to succumb to the wrath of the herd. For I have seen what the wrath can met. For when, the herd stampedes to an end, all in its way must "look out" for nothing can save one. But what is most fearful is that most of these sheep also will vote for Obama this fall and will not need "Global warming" as their mantra anymore. So indeed, Obama has saved the world and all it's inhabitances, now we can move on to the bigger fear of what's next? Socialism Rocks!
farthDec 31, 2008
Apparently in right wing world, the study from one scientist from Russia is all it takes to dispute the conclusions of the National Academy of Sciences.