Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
No Wingnut Lies!
128 Followers
Comgen & Dr. Socks' love child
12553 Followers
Janine Wallace
4730 Followers
timelessbw
668 Followers
FirstMackerel
133 Followers
AngelWardriver
11954 Followers
The Web Baron
389 Followers
beatnut2k4
4852 Followers
novenatorApr 8, 2010
This the game of the #neodiggcons. They always try to bury the truth, then when (or if) an article hits the front page, they hide like c**kroaches. Sort of entertaining actually.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
janineeeApr 8, 2010
Wow quirck, tweek much?EDIT: Funny, I wrote this before I saw Novenator called you out for the same thing, you're giving yourself away quirck.
wonhunglohApr 8, 2010
lawlDomain registration details are not "personal info." Before registering a domain, you may want to check the ICANN rules <a class="user" href="http://www.icann.org/en/faq/" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/en/faq/</a>
archiesteelApr 9, 2010
"Because in terms of world events and influence, their own countries are largely ineffectual. Canada's primary function is to serve as the USA's hat."Yeah, we'll keep that in mind next you're begging us for oil. Or to help you in Afghanistan.<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_the_United_States" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_t ...</a>Keep up the good work, cowboy.
Closed AccountApr 9, 2010
Archie - If you write a post that says: "These teabaggers are so stupid. There also crazy!"Then, I'm probably going to point out the error.I need to meet a Canadian conservative on Digg. I don't know that I've ever come across one.
ultimisApr 9, 2010
@ArchieYou were clearly copying and pasting a thesaurus search into your comment; abigiousness is not used, ambiguity is. "Ain't" can also be found in the dictionary, that doesn't mean you should use it.I'll give you props for knowing more than one language. I learned spanish and now haven't used it in over 10 years.
thecoolestguyApr 10, 2010
First I want to know who the f**k dugg up LiquidIse's stupid post. Are people that ignorant about liberty and the Constitution that they actually thought that LiquidIse's tyrannical political positions make sense?@LiquidIse,---Wait you are defending this platform? ---Of course I'm defending their platform. They believe in upholding the Constitution.---The reason the Constiution Party is ok with the constitutions freedom of religion is because they quite literally interpret it to be "a us citizen is freely allowed to discriminate based on religion".----Of course a US citizen is allowed to discriminate based on religion. Any one in a free country is allowed to discriminate against any one they want, for any reason they want.That's what a free country means: people being allowed to say any thing they want, associate with WHOEVER they want, and do whatever they they want, as long as they do not resort to VIOLENCE or fraud.---"We assert that private organizations such as the Boy Scouts of America, can determine their own membership, volunteers, and employment based on their oaths and creeds."----What the f**k is the problem with this? Does the government need to make discrimination illegal?Your ideas on the Constitution and the rights people have are f**ked. You have no idea what the Constitution is and what freedom is. Your ideas on liberty are on par with those of a communist party member in the Cuban government.
liquidiseApr 10, 2010
"A free society means people having the right to act like bigots."And thus we see how any ideal taken to an extreme becomes for a modern society. The government has a duty to regulate how a private sector is allowed to discriminate. Because free discrimination, as you describe it, would allow the private sector to leave a chosen minority entirely unemployed and impoverished. Do you really not draw this conclusion from your stances?I agree that in a totally free society you are allowed to discriminate. Note, however, that legal discrimination is a blatant attack on the basic civil rights of the discriminated. So why stop there? In a truly free society you could pillage and rape as well. Hell, a TRULY free society would let me murder people like you with bats**t insane political theories.In your own words, you are all for people, private sector business, etc to be allowed to discriminate based on religion and race and anything else they choose. I should have stopped bothering to talk sense into you then.
juslenApr 10, 2010
aren't you clever
novenatorApr 10, 2010
The reason why I don't like trading words with you adam is because you don't debate. Real debate requires a certain foundation in reality instead of constant positioning, including being able to admit when you are wrong, something you are incapable of. When you get caught in a logical fallacy, you shift, twist, distort, or distract to avoid blame for your error. This might be good in your sales profession, but it certainly doesn't motivate anyone who knows you to attempt any sort of meaningful discussion.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
chelsikaApr 17, 2010
"pot meet kettle"Says the guy who commented on every one of these replies & owns a terribly designed website that is a ridiculously lame attempt at political commentary to a girl who logs onto Digg every few days.Riiiiight...