No work in vista Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.5384](C) Copyright 1985-2005 Microsoft Corp.C:UsersTom Parker>at 23:29 /interactive "cmd.exe"Warning: Due to security enhancements, this task will run at the timeexpected but not interactively.Use schtasks.exe utility if interactive task is required ('schtasks /?'for details).Access is denied.C:UsersTom Parker>
wtf. This is complete bulls**t because of the fact that you need to be logged in as admin. Which makes it completely useless. Theres rock music to make them seem like badasses, but they probably havent even tried it on an account with restricted access.
i agree with boxman. If you worked in the IT field for either the state, a hospital, or a lot of other IT organizations you'd see that some of them still have very antiquated hardware and software because the increase in efficiency or productivity doesn't justify the cost of upgrading. Old Plotters, large scale printers, proprietary equipment, etc often are considered obsolete but are still in use.
The content in the video is all stolen from the article I originally wrote, found here:<a class="user" href="http://www.pandora-security.com/forum/about2093.html">http://www.pandora-security.com/forum/about2093.html</a>Jerkoff removed the copy right info, and mauled it with the crappy rock music.I understand many of the comments reguarding the inaccuracy of this "tutorial", and would like to, 1) Say that the complaints are (for the most part) valid; and 2) I'm sorry if you feel I wasted your time.It's true that using the at command to get a system "shell" and then run applications is an old trick, I was playing with it one day and accidentally crashed explorer.exe, and restarted; at first I thought I had broken something, but after I a while I figured out what had happened. I wasn't going to write an article on it, until I googled around and found that no one mentioned running the entire desktop as SYSTEM. So it was just going to be a small little side note, that you could use in conjuction with the AT system vuln., but somehow over the course of a week it became a huge bloated article (sorry). Anyways, I put it out on my website, then a friend told me to submit it to bugtraq (so I did), and the moderator approved it; I was shocked to see it end up in my inbox, as I had never submitted anything to bugtraq. Of course it got trolled alot, as it was here.Anyways, as to the "limited user" issues; at the time I wrote this, my home machine was down, so I used the machines at a local internet cafe, and at a community college; both of which had Group Policies applied, that enabled the task manager for limited accounts. I didn't have extensive testing labs, which the trolls here seem to be able to pull out of their behind. I apologize for my mistake.Despite not working on limited user accounts, this is still fun, as you anything you launch is run as system, which can lead to some weird things happening, also results seem to change depending on the hotfixes and service packs installed. I still feel that calling the local privilege escalation is appropriate, as there is alot of use for running explore as SYSTEM (just ask any computer tech how hard it can be to switch out troublesome drivers on the fly, delete locked files, or kill spyware that runs under the system context). If you have trouble getting this to work, I advise checking out the article linked to earlier, I am also available for contact (info can be found at the article).
Good news for all......................... Those who are aspiring to be a teacher shouldn't wary some torrid entrance exam to pass . you can easily excel in entrance without working too hard for it . the key is to "Work Smart" and that is exactly what we do.<a class="user" href="http://test-help.org/icts.htm">http://test-help.org/icts.htm</a>
zigzagsJul 31, 2006
It's that easy folks.
imthedarkcydeJul 31, 2006
sorry to say, most (smart) network admins DO run windows, because they are (smart) enough to take a paying job
tompJul 31, 2006
No work in vista Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.5384](C) Copyright 1985-2005 Microsoft Corp.C:UsersTom Parker>at 23:29 /interactive "cmd.exe"Warning: Due to security enhancements, this task will run at the timeexpected but not interactively.Use schtasks.exe utility if interactive task is required ('schtasks /?'for details).Access is denied.C:UsersTom Parker>
wiredforpowerAug 1, 2006
wtf. This is complete bulls**t because of the fact that you need to be logged in as admin. Which makes it completely useless. Theres rock music to make them seem like badasses, but they probably havent even tried it on an account with restricted access.
shm0edawgAug 1, 2006
i agree with boxman. If you worked in the IT field for either the state, a hospital, or a lot of other IT organizations you'd see that some of them still have very antiquated hardware and software because the increase in efficiency or productivity doesn't justify the cost of upgrading. Old Plotters, large scale printers, proprietary equipment, etc often are considered obsolete but are still in use.
tjtomlAug 2, 2006
Ummm.... should anyone even bother to explain this? Buried.
zipk0derAug 3, 2006
The content in the video is all stolen from the article I originally wrote, found here:<a class="user" href="http://www.pandora-security.com/forum/about2093.html">http://www.pandora-security.com/forum/about2093.html</a>Jerkoff removed the copy right info, and mauled it with the crappy rock music.I understand many of the comments reguarding the inaccuracy of this "tutorial", and would like to, 1) Say that the complaints are (for the most part) valid; and 2) I'm sorry if you feel I wasted your time.It's true that using the at command to get a system "shell" and then run applications is an old trick, I was playing with it one day and accidentally crashed explorer.exe, and restarted; at first I thought I had broken something, but after I a while I figured out what had happened. I wasn't going to write an article on it, until I googled around and found that no one mentioned running the entire desktop as SYSTEM. So it was just going to be a small little side note, that you could use in conjuction with the AT system vuln., but somehow over the course of a week it became a huge bloated article (sorry). Anyways, I put it out on my website, then a friend told me to submit it to bugtraq (so I did), and the moderator approved it; I was shocked to see it end up in my inbox, as I had never submitted anything to bugtraq. Of course it got trolled alot, as it was here.Anyways, as to the "limited user" issues; at the time I wrote this, my home machine was down, so I used the machines at a local internet cafe, and at a community college; both of which had Group Policies applied, that enabled the task manager for limited accounts. I didn't have extensive testing labs, which the trolls here seem to be able to pull out of their behind. I apologize for my mistake.Despite not working on limited user accounts, this is still fun, as you anything you launch is run as system, which can lead to some weird things happening, also results seem to change depending on the hotfixes and service packs installed. I still feel that calling the local privilege escalation is appropriate, as there is alot of use for running explore as SYSTEM (just ask any computer tech how hard it can be to switch out troublesome drivers on the fly, delete locked files, or kill spyware that runs under the system context). If you have trouble getting this to work, I advise checking out the article linked to earlier, I am also available for contact (info can be found at the article).
secretsquirrel4Aug 22, 2006
judging from the comments regarding this topic it's easy to see that they are mostly comprised of prepubescence.
jhonblack12Nov 7, 2008
Good news for all......................... Those who are aspiring to be a teacher shouldn't wary some torrid entrance exam to pass . you can easily excel in entrance without working too hard for it . the key is to "Work Smart" and that is exactly what we do.<a class="user" href="http://test-help.org/icts.htm">http://test-help.org/icts.htm</a>