Owning people like onetimer gets old after a while. It's like owning somebody in a video games, fun for a while but then it gets old.Enjoy it while it lasts.
No one smacked me down. Yet again I made a point that was not actually refuted by anything other than fallacious arguments. You people parrot this "endorsement" by some AUSTIN NCAAP Chapter leader (who half the time is referred to erroneously as the NCAAP leader) as if it is actually some kind of proof.There's actually a fallacy named for it:<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority</a>I would have responded sooner but I actually have you know, a job?and LMAO at this "he was only in it to spread the message" revisionist bulls**t. I only have to point to 9 month old digg posts where you guys were singing a different tune. A tune that sounded like "he's in it to win it"PS: You have to remember inobla, these paul supporters don't have fully functional mental facilities. You'll have to understand that they have a difficult time distinguishing between individuals who aren't part of the Ron paul "hive mind"By the way, where's JIDF? <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/users/JIDF">http://digg.com/users/JIDF</a>:)
Another thing I'd like to add: "overwhelmingly defeated" means the same thing as "getting owned!" Ron Paul indeed got owned. Reading months of comments about how he was going to obliterate the competition!! Waking America up with the right message!! OMGZ@!@#!!! What a bunch of hot air that was.Lets do a little math here..US Population ≈ 305,650,000Eligible voters ≈ 201,500,000People who voted ≈ 126,500,000Over 100k? ok, lets say 250k!!!RonPaul R3volutiion! ≈ 250,000250,000/126,500,000"AllyOfReason", would you please "reason" me out a percentage on this one?? Just move the decimal point a couple places if you can figure out what direction. Now you know the definition of OWNED. Please refrain from assigning it incorrectly in the future. Thanks!
You guys are missing the point entirely.When did I ever state that Ron Paul was going to be President? Another hint: never. I knew from the start he would be impossible to elect. Anybody soliciting real change is. Ron Paul himself even admitted privately that his intent was not winning.It's called breaking the status quo morons, it has to start somewhere.You guys can stand back, fling personal insults, and troll my comments constantly but it's not going to change reality.And onetimer, please just tune out... I'm not interested in your intellectual diatribe. NCAAP? Did you mean NAACP? And to think, you can't even get the name of the organization correct yet you're the informed one? Right......
acrinimirilNov 11, 2008
You used to be a Ron Paul supporter:<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/users/Airforcefalco/history/search?needle=ron+paul&section=">http://digg.com/users/Airforcefalco/history/search ...</a>What happened to you?
migsharkNov 11, 2008
Reverse psychology?
Closed AccountNov 13, 2008
Owning people like onetimer gets old after a while. It's like owning somebody in a video games, fun for a while but then it gets old.Enjoy it while it lasts.
Closed AccountNov 14, 2008
No one smacked me down. Yet again I made a point that was not actually refuted by anything other than fallacious arguments. You people parrot this "endorsement" by some AUSTIN NCAAP Chapter leader (who half the time is referred to erroneously as the NCAAP leader) as if it is actually some kind of proof.There's actually a fallacy named for it:<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority</a>I would have responded sooner but I actually have you know, a job?and LMAO at this "he was only in it to spread the message" revisionist bulls**t. I only have to point to 9 month old digg posts where you guys were singing a different tune. A tune that sounded like "he's in it to win it"PS: You have to remember inobla, these paul supporters don't have fully functional mental facilities. You'll have to understand that they have a difficult time distinguishing between individuals who aren't part of the Ron paul "hive mind"By the way, where's JIDF? <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/users/JIDF">http://digg.com/users/JIDF</a>:)
inoblaNov 14, 2008
Another thing I'd like to add: "overwhelmingly defeated" means the same thing as "getting owned!" Ron Paul indeed got owned. Reading months of comments about how he was going to obliterate the competition!! Waking America up with the right message!! OMGZ@!@#!!! What a bunch of hot air that was.Lets do a little math here..US Population ≈ 305,650,000Eligible voters ≈ 201,500,000People who voted ≈ 126,500,000Over 100k? ok, lets say 250k!!!RonPaul R3volutiion! ≈ 250,000250,000/126,500,000"AllyOfReason", would you please "reason" me out a percentage on this one?? Just move the decimal point a couple places if you can figure out what direction. Now you know the definition of OWNED. Please refrain from assigning it incorrectly in the future. Thanks!
Closed AccountNov 15, 2008
You guys are missing the point entirely.When did I ever state that Ron Paul was going to be President? Another hint: never. I knew from the start he would be impossible to elect. Anybody soliciting real change is. Ron Paul himself even admitted privately that his intent was not winning.It's called breaking the status quo morons, it has to start somewhere.You guys can stand back, fling personal insults, and troll my comments constantly but it's not going to change reality.And onetimer, please just tune out... I'm not interested in your intellectual diatribe. NCAAP? Did you mean NAACP? And to think, you can't even get the name of the organization correct yet you're the informed one? Right......
Closed AccountNov 15, 2008
A professional digg troll reporting TOS violations?Did my head just explode?