I've read my history books; that's how I knew you didn't know what the f**k you were talking about. I agree we've made many bad and/or unethical moves over there, beginning with Mossadegh, but that doesn't rationalize the murder of innocent civilians.
Yeah, criticizing someone on their user name is kind of lame. People have criticized my name as having to do with the band 311 and I don't like them at all. I'm not going to criticize you for having the user name of a loser basketball player who used to play for the Supersonics. Stick to the issues.
Marque and Reprisal specifically is allowed. But read his act - It would've completley transferred to the power to the President with a massive budget and no oversight. Marque and Reprisal are supposed to be generated and backed by Congress, not the President. Therefore, the law is Unconstitutional because it was giving power the President was not expressly given already.1. He isn't substance. He is failure. What has he achieved?2. So a politician and a self-selecting poll decided? Oh great then it's decidedAnd when I said "weak argument" I meant "weak but easily defeated argument". Read the 14th Amendment.
And you're telling me that you're ok with Paul attempting to greatly expand with no oversight Executive Power?His Act would've made companies like Blackwater in Iraq the norm.
Although we agree on many issues, I don't like the post election world all you libertarians will create.No social safety net, services gone, states underfunded, on and on.
dieboldcracyJan 9, 2009
I wish he were a better speaker. He stumbles too much......our CAA??? CIA??
kmyeJan 9, 2009
I've read my history books; that's how I knew you didn't know what the f**k you were talking about. I agree we've made many bad and/or unethical moves over there, beginning with Mossadegh, but that doesn't rationalize the murder of innocent civilians.
reed311Jan 10, 2009
Yeah, criticizing someone on their user name is kind of lame. People have criticized my name as having to do with the band 311 and I don't like them at all. I'm not going to criticize you for having the user name of a loser basketball player who used to play for the Supersonics. Stick to the issues.
hortnonJan 10, 2009
Marque and Reprisal specifically is allowed. But read his act - It would've completley transferred to the power to the President with a massive budget and no oversight. Marque and Reprisal are supposed to be generated and backed by Congress, not the President. Therefore, the law is Unconstitutional because it was giving power the President was not expressly given already.1. He isn't substance. He is failure. What has he achieved?2. So a politician and a self-selecting poll decided? Oh great then it's decidedAnd when I said "weak argument" I meant "weak but easily defeated argument". Read the 14th Amendment.
hortnonJan 13, 2009
And you're telling me that you're ok with Paul attempting to greatly expand with no oversight Executive Power?His Act would've made companies like Blackwater in Iraq the norm.
Closed AccountJan 13, 2009
Character, knowledge, political courage, etc.
Closed AccountJan 18, 2009
Although we agree on many issues, I don't like the post election world all you libertarians will create.No social safety net, services gone, states underfunded, on and on.
mrgolf34Jan 18, 2009
only guy that gets it