infowars.net — Presidential candidate, Congressman and now New York Times Bestseller Ron Paul appeared on the Alex Jones show this week to discuss a plethora of issues including the lack of choice and opportunity for real change offered by the three remaining candidates.
May 21, 2008 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountMay 22, 2008
Jesus, my stalkers are still here, blabbering on?ZZeke- It is very easy for me to say rexblade is an idiot. It has nothing whatsoever to do with his career choice. One of my uncle's has been a truck driver all his life, and he is one of the smartest people I know. I judge people based on their actions. Always have, always will. All I have to do is READ REXBLADE'S POSTS. Pretty simple, just like knowing you are a whiny little pussy, just from reading your posts.I am not sorry I have been successful, as much as it upsets you. I realize the Mrk's of the world and you HATE that people make something of their lives. I am most proud of raising two intelligent, well adjusted, successful kids. That is success in my book. All the monetary success just makes it easy for me to do whatever I want to do. You don't like it? TOUGH s**t.I do find it very telling how many Ron Paul supporters absolutely HATE it when people prosper, so well, SUCCEED. Get over it.And, I am done with you. Your bitchy little whining is trite and boring. I am a successful person. DEAL WITH IT.
graphictruthMay 23, 2008
Actually, with one US parent and born on US soil, he is. Regardless of the legal status of Hawaii. I agree that it's acquisition was illegal - but regardless of that, until such a time as that legal mess is sorted out, the black letter principle defaults in favor of those affected. So, in other words, at most he would become a dual citizen. That is to say, in cases of conflicts between jurisdictions over the allegiance of a person, rights are additive, rather than subtractive.I might also add that this objection falls into the "Hail Mary" category, if not outright Mad Tinfoil Hatter Rhetoric.And of course, one should consider what is true now, as opposed to true THEN. In other words, let us say that in an alternate universe, the United Nations objection regarding the legality of a plebiscite had binding force.Would it then follow that a plebiscite conducted to the satisfaction of the United Nations have a different outcome?Indeed, let us suppose that the United States of America did the right thing regarding small powers (for a wonder) and granted the rights of the hereditary leadership of the Islands to contest in a plebiscite for the right to ruler ship - would it therefore follow that the native Hawaiians of today would feel the same about the Divine Right of Kings as would have their forefathers?For myself I doubt it - for just as has Hawaii evolved, so has the United States, and the State of Hawaii along with it. Further, I should point out that the Anglo-Saxons had not the benefit of a plebiscite when invaded by the Normans - nor was that true of the Celts driven out of Normandy.Both of these things were great wrongs, and many suffered - but shall the Anglo-Saxons therefore be entitled to reparations from the Normans - or shall all their mutual descendants be satisfied by the resurgence of Anglo-Saxon English?Or in other words, Frigg off, ye damned fool.
rmtatumMay 28, 2008
Alex Jones is awesome! The info warriors fight on!
chromedaffodilsJun 10, 2008
<a class="user" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWr8DXjbET8&feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWr8DXjbET8&feature ...</a>