Hi Krateeinn, I have enjoyed reading your posts the last few days. For sure we both agree this is censorship. May I offer a quick point? Many future events will be sponsored by supporters of other candidates. That is the nature of our republic. We must not assume this is the root cause. I'm sure if you checked every future event you will find McCain supporters. The real problem here is censorship and so everything is now suspect. Allow me to share more. I voted for Bush both times (now I regret my vote) but if you looked at my former donations I sent over $2K with each run. Now I support Ron Paul 100% but if someone wanted to check my history some of the Paul supporters may think I'm a NeoCon. I hope you respect my point. At this point we don't have the real reason from Iowa even the radio broadcast didn't offer real facts. Is is possible to assume the party is trying to censor Paul? Was it Ed himself who made the call to not include the best canidate? Keep in mind Paul wants to abolish the IRS though I haven't heard the details this is going to upset a lot of people and the Fair Tax nuts can't even undertand the simply point that the tax itself is unlawful they just want to see a fair tax. Krateein, I'm near completion of my first book and it does deal with the IRS. The book will provide additional evidence. But it also ties in the world goverment theme and based on the way the Fair Tax would operate in my view the Fair Tax will become a tool of world goverment leaders and the recent changes at the UN support this concern. It may be that the supporters of Fair Tax don't want to hear Ron's views or even allow him to share them before the public. In closing anytime Paul is censored it's cause for alarm. I have offered possible solutions on the prior post and I'm seeking answers. At this point eveything is cause for concern. If Ed would do the fair and just thing and invite Paul then we could put this at rest then prepare for the next time. Also, I think everytime they try to censor Paul then even the worst new reporter will start to ask why... So Bad news is sometimes great news. By the way go buy the June 18 copy of The American ConservativeThe front Page has Ron Paul and Mr. 9-11 and it reads The Ron Paul Moment "The debate the republican party wants to avoid"
Call your local radio show and bring up this issue. I called up mine and they said "Who is Ron Paul". I've talked to my family and friends and 9 out of 10 people don't know who he is.
Crimininy sake alive folks, "Probably one of those Christians who are war-mongers. Kill them all and let God sort them out." Characterizing people like that is deplorable.
Perhaps it was simply an opposition candidate's supporter who posted Failor's home phone number as a "false flag operation?" It certainly worked out as a red herring in the radio interview.Soon this will be old news. It's all happening according to God's plan.
Good thing for YouTube Ron Paul can tell us what he would say at their tax relief forum. Oh ya, he already has. Duh. 'Get rid of the IRS and replace it with nothing'. Next.
I emailed the organization Ed works for and still no response after 2 days. I guess we have to call his house! Just kidding. I agree that is not cool, but they never did answer the question. Why did they choose to exclude Ron Paul? Saying they didn't think he was viable is not enough. They need to specifically state what their criteria for determining whether or not he is viable is! They must have had one, if they did not, then they need to state flatly it was totally arbitrary.
darel99Jun 21, 2007
Hey Grunk, You make an excellent point.
darel99Jun 21, 2007
Hi Krateeinn, I have enjoyed reading your posts the last few days. For sure we both agree this is censorship. May I offer a quick point? Many future events will be sponsored by supporters of other candidates. That is the nature of our republic. We must not assume this is the root cause. I'm sure if you checked every future event you will find McCain supporters. The real problem here is censorship and so everything is now suspect. Allow me to share more. I voted for Bush both times (now I regret my vote) but if you looked at my former donations I sent over $2K with each run. Now I support Ron Paul 100% but if someone wanted to check my history some of the Paul supporters may think I'm a NeoCon. I hope you respect my point. At this point we don't have the real reason from Iowa even the radio broadcast didn't offer real facts. Is is possible to assume the party is trying to censor Paul? Was it Ed himself who made the call to not include the best canidate? Keep in mind Paul wants to abolish the IRS though I haven't heard the details this is going to upset a lot of people and the Fair Tax nuts can't even undertand the simply point that the tax itself is unlawful they just want to see a fair tax. Krateein, I'm near completion of my first book and it does deal with the IRS. The book will provide additional evidence. But it also ties in the world goverment theme and based on the way the Fair Tax would operate in my view the Fair Tax will become a tool of world goverment leaders and the recent changes at the UN support this concern. It may be that the supporters of Fair Tax don't want to hear Ron's views or even allow him to share them before the public. In closing anytime Paul is censored it's cause for alarm. I have offered possible solutions on the prior post and I'm seeking answers. At this point eveything is cause for concern. If Ed would do the fair and just thing and invite Paul then we could put this at rest then prepare for the next time. Also, I think everytime they try to censor Paul then even the worst new reporter will start to ask why... So Bad news is sometimes great news. By the way go buy the June 18 copy of The American ConservativeThe front Page has Ron Paul and Mr. 9-11 and it reads The Ron Paul Moment "The debate the republican party wants to avoid"
toejuicedcupJun 21, 2007
Call your local radio show and bring up this issue. I called up mine and they said "Who is Ron Paul". I've talked to my family and friends and 9 out of 10 people don't know who he is.
teichenauerJun 21, 2007
Crimininy sake alive folks, "Probably one of those Christians who are war-mongers. Kill them all and let God sort them out." Characterizing people like that is deplorable.
scottynzJun 21, 2007
Perhaps it was simply an opposition candidate's supporter who posted Failor's home phone number as a "false flag operation?" It certainly worked out as a red herring in the radio interview.Soon this will be old news. It's all happening according to God's plan.
Closed AccountJun 22, 2007
Wrong, he's for ending the INCOME sales, he still wants at tax at point of sale.
energyindepJun 22, 2007
Good thing for YouTube Ron Paul can tell us what he would say at their tax relief forum. Oh ya, he already has. Duh. 'Get rid of the IRS and replace it with nothing'. Next.
librorangerJun 22, 2007
I emailed the organization Ed works for and still no response after 2 days. I guess we have to call his house! Just kidding. I agree that is not cool, but they never did answer the question. Why did they choose to exclude Ron Paul? Saying they didn't think he was viable is not enough. They need to specifically state what their criteria for determining whether or not he is viable is! They must have had one, if they did not, then they need to state flatly it was totally arbitrary.