news.yahoo.com — Striving for an epic upset in liberal Massachusetts, Republican Scott Brown pushed ahead of Democrat Martha Coakley on Tuesday in a U.S. Senate election that became a referendum on President Barack Obama's health care overhaul and his first year.
Jan 20, 2010 View in Crawl 4
originallucid1Jan 20, 2010
Witty? More witty than teabaggers I suppose. Because now I can say, "Hey libtards, how do my balls taste now?"
shauncorleoneJan 21, 2010
Lemme see:- an individual mandate with a potential penalty up to $912- Commonwealth care program expected to cover 215,000 for $725 million projected to be 342,000 at cost of $1.35 billion by 6/11. Even with more covered, that's 17% more per person than projected.- $100 million funding gap in 3/08 required a $1.5 billion loan from the Federal government- Continual state budget deficits in the billions- Reduction of new business starts in Mass by 16%. Without new and expanding business, it'll be awfully tough to close those gaps.Sounds like they're really knocking it out of the park
pureadrenalineJan 22, 2010
Almost every conservative article posted on DIGG is immediately sabotaged, buried and silenced in whatever way possible...in this case the customary liberal censors just cannot keep up with the rapid conservative response to Brown's stunning upset!! Hopefully this a breakthrough that will allow conservatives to overcome the massive censorship by MASS BURIAL TACTICS normally done by resident liberals at DIGG!!Up until now the bias has been primarily a matter of libs vastly outnumbering conservatives here at DIGG and using BURIAL/CENSORSHIP as a matter of policy...
thespiffJan 22, 2010
@hivoltage815Just look at the platform of some of the tea party groups that campaigned for Brown...
archiesteelJan 23, 2010
Oh, and I don't say "eh" or "aboot." I'm a French Canadian, we don't use these cliche expressions. Put that in your ten-gallon hat for future reference.
Closed AccountJan 26, 2010
It's fairly straight forward, where do the people who are saddled with GVT care go in order to be seen by a doctor? They go to the places that AREN'T run by a GVT?!?!?....Cancer is the uncontrolled replication of cells. It occurs over time and each type has it's own a rate of replication, some faster, some slower. The sooner you find it, whichever kind it is, (and hopefully wipe it out) the better your chance of survival.You WILL NOT get around to it sooner, if you're waiting in line for a couple years whilst whatever it is grows exponentially larger every day?!?!?! Thus the primary difference no one wants to admit, between Socialized "Health Care" and Market based Health Care. You WILL get in sooner in a market based system, you may not get in AT ALL in a socialized system depending on your age. If you're too old, you're not "worth" saving and the GVT lets you go in favor of a younger taxpayer that can still pay into their system.Very cold, and very sinister, but that is the way it works.
Closed AccountJan 26, 2010
So your answer is... lower everyone into the pit so we die in equal numbers, brillant...
vonbargenjlJan 26, 2010
haha, oh. cool. i thought you had a danish flag. just realized i had the colors reversed. personally, i am fluent in 3 languages and know a good deal of 4 more.