Say it isn't so. Yet another Republican going to jail. With all the indictments, criminal prosecutions, and page sex scandals, how can a people still vote for Republicans (especially the Christian right)?I think it would be hypocritical if these people continued to vote Republican. I mean are they not the moral base of America?They say that politicians in Washington, D.C. represent their voters. If that's the case, then these voters are the most corrupt and morally bankrupted people that I have ever seen.If you vote Republican today, you might as tattoo the word "hypocrite" on your forehead. Because I can't see how these thugs are representing any American.Here's the new logo the Republican Party will be using soon ...<a class="user" href="http://www.democratgiftshop.com/cgi-bin/store/store.cgi/571511948/liberal_shop/375913">http://www.democratgiftshop.com/cgi-bin/store/store.cgi/571511948/liberal_shop/375913</a>
Fox News stopped being right-biased as a news organization a long time ago (ignoring their pundits). If you watched as much as coverage as I did of Shep Smith fellating Hezbollah members you'd be convinced too.
The only negative Harry Reid story was his land deal. And that was bulls**t. You seem to like bashing reid for something he didn't do while most of us are bashing politicians who actually did do something bad. i.e. Bush, Foley, Ney, etc...
Something he didn't do? You mean transfer land over so he didn't have to pay taxes on 1.1 million in profit? Quit repeating Democrat talking points and see for yourself. And by the way, Foley resigned immediately.
I can see how Republican talking points are sooooo much better. ;^>Reid made $700K, and he asked for the Senate Ethics Committee to review it.The thing I find amazing about Foley is not only the cover-up, and the spin to somehow blame the Democrats even though Ross (the reporter who uncovered it) clearly said Republicans were his source, but that Foley was told to re-run by Reynolds and others even though he wanted to retire and they knew this was a problem. Fordham isn't the only one to say they knew about this as early as 2000.Funny how quiet everybody is about the Hastert sweetheart deal too.He bought a piece of land for cheap a little while back in Illinois, and made 2 million on the sale following his inclusion of a provision in a transportation appropriations bill for the construction of a highway near the land. I'm sure there's no conflict of interest there - actually directing legislation to make yourself a tidy little profit.By the way - is Ney resigning yet? Isn't it great that he pleaded guilty and is still drawing hundreds of thousands of dollars in salary?
deesnutzOct 13, 2006
Say it isn't so. Yet another Republican going to jail. With all the indictments, criminal prosecutions, and page sex scandals, how can a people still vote for Republicans (especially the Christian right)?I think it would be hypocritical if these people continued to vote Republican. I mean are they not the moral base of America?They say that politicians in Washington, D.C. represent their voters. If that's the case, then these voters are the most corrupt and morally bankrupted people that I have ever seen.If you vote Republican today, you might as tattoo the word "hypocrite" on your forehead. Because I can't see how these thugs are representing any American.Here's the new logo the Republican Party will be using soon ...<a class="user" href="http://www.democratgiftshop.com/cgi-bin/store/store.cgi/571511948/liberal_shop/375913">http://www.democratgiftshop.com/cgi-bin/store/store.cgi/571511948/liberal_shop/375913</a>
nomadgOct 13, 2006
This paper gives the best argument Ive seen against corporate lobbing, including why its not really legal.<a class="user" href="http://www.mcn.org/e/iii/afd/santaclara.html">http://www.mcn.org/e/iii/afd/santaclara.html</a>
salinemistOct 14, 2006
Fox News stopped being right-biased as a news organization a long time ago (ignoring their pundits). If you watched as much as coverage as I did of Shep Smith fellating Hezbollah members you'd be convinced too.
jameskOct 14, 2006
The only negative Harry Reid story was his land deal. And that was bulls**t. You seem to like bashing reid for something he didn't do while most of us are bashing politicians who actually did do something bad. i.e. Bush, Foley, Ney, etc...
zeligOct 14, 2006
Something he didn't do? You mean transfer land over so he didn't have to pay taxes on 1.1 million in profit? Quit repeating Democrat talking points and see for yourself. And by the way, Foley resigned immediately.
denverjugglerOct 15, 2006
I can see how Republican talking points are sooooo much better. ;^>Reid made $700K, and he asked for the Senate Ethics Committee to review it.The thing I find amazing about Foley is not only the cover-up, and the spin to somehow blame the Democrats even though Ross (the reporter who uncovered it) clearly said Republicans were his source, but that Foley was told to re-run by Reynolds and others even though he wanted to retire and they knew this was a problem. Fordham isn't the only one to say they knew about this as early as 2000.Funny how quiet everybody is about the Hastert sweetheart deal too.He bought a piece of land for cheap a little while back in Illinois, and made 2 million on the sale following his inclusion of a provision in a transportation appropriations bill for the construction of a highway near the land. I'm sure there's no conflict of interest there - actually directing legislation to make yourself a tidy little profit.By the way - is Ney resigning yet? Isn't it great that he pleaded guilty and is still drawing hundreds of thousands of dollars in salary?