arstechnica.com — When the RIAA filed a file-sharing lawsuit against a sergeant in the US Army earlier this year, it included thousands of files containing pornography that had nothing to do with the case. The Sgt. decided to fight back, by filing a counterclaim accusing the RIAA of violating his privacy.
Jul 30, 2007 View in Crawl 4
astrotrainJul 31, 2007
I'll second that drink, I've seen design using a C=64 BBS and ASCII.
astrotrainJul 31, 2007
The dark side of the force is not that evil...
weebitAug 1, 2007
weebit does the happy dance too when necessary, and needed. But not for this article, because The RIAA is no party animal, doesn't think happy thoughts, and could care less about their customers. They only have a love for $$.
weebitAug 1, 2007
weebit does the happy dance too when necessary, and needed. But not for this article, because The RIAA is no party animal, doesn't think happy thoughts, and could care less about their customers. They only have a love for $$.
mistydAug 9, 2007
RIAA can't really believe that this is going to do anything but destroy them with their consumer base, do they? Idiots. Anyhow, RIAA humor:RIAA To Sue Minnesota<a class="user" href="http://www.crystalair.com/content.php?id=91200708004">http://www.crystalair.com/content.php?id=91200708004</a>
realdeal83Aug 9, 2007
Sorry, maybe I should be more clear. The laws in the US suck regarding P2P, they passed because of RIAA lobbyists and not to protect artists but the RIAA bottom line. The way I see it the RIAA only has a few years (10?) left before there is no use for it anymore. And the tactics to try and shame the defendants is sad.