thinkprogress.org — A new study reports that military strikes against Iran over its nuclear program ?could accelerate rather than halt Tehran?s production of atomic weapons." Former U.N. weapons Inspector Hans Blix warns that ?armed attacks on Iran would very likely lead to the result they were meant to avoid ? the building of nuclear weapons within a few years."
Mar 5, 2007 View in Crawl 4
nicuMar 6, 2007
That's the first justification for war - you have to have weapons of mass destruction. Then you'd have to claim Iran is an imminent threat, then you'd claim that Iran has been funding terrorism throughout the middle east, with links to Al Qaeda. And if anyone questions you just go on the attack and claim anyone who disagrees with you hates the troops, hates freedom, and hates America.
dmannMar 11, 2007
An air strike would increase a hostile nation doing hostile stuff?Gee, ya think?