"For starters let's all admit it's a great game"It really isn't, its just like Modern Warfare 1, they didn't do anything new... in fact they removed features! But then I am the kind of person who only gets games for the multiplayer experience so in my opinion Left 4 Dead 2 was a much better, and 10 bucks cheaper, buy.
Valve did a nasty this year, too. L4D2 was an unjustified sequel. Valve said there was simply too much content to be released in DLC, but TF2 DLC is nearly as much as the entirety of L4D2. Infinity Ward ate it and rumors are Blizzard is going to start charging for Bnet in general.It seems indie developers for the PC are making a pretty good run for a slice of the pie.
Stop whining. L4D 2 has more campaigns than the original, has tons of guns and items, more zombies, and has campaign, versus, survival, scavenge and realism modes.If someone paid $50 for the first, why would they not pay for more? Me, I waited till it was $25, and plan on doing the same with its sequel.If you keep complaining like this, when a company is giving you a finely polished diamond, then you aren't helping the problem in the gaming industry.
@cowieI'm already tired of playing MW2 Mp (ps3) and I got the game on the 22nd, granted I played the Mp for like 30+ hours. But TF2 (xbox) on the other hand, and I only recently started to play it, has like 80+ hours. If I still had my gold membership I'd still be playing it.
Closed AccountNov 14, 2009
Twas only a matter of time....
p0p5uxNov 17, 2009
Nickelback sucks.
jtorkbobNov 18, 2009
[citation needed]
Closed AccountNov 23, 2009
<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/pc_games/Kid_really_has_nervous_breakdown_cus_modern_warfare_2_sucks" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/pc_games/Kid_really_has_nervous_br ...</a>
blackcowNov 29, 2009
"For starters let's all admit it's a great game"It really isn't, its just like Modern Warfare 1, they didn't do anything new... in fact they removed features! But then I am the kind of person who only gets games for the multiplayer experience so in my opinion Left 4 Dead 2 was a much better, and 10 bucks cheaper, buy.
Closed AccountNov 29, 2009
what about the CTD crap with left 4 dead 2 it has the same DRM as MW2 and the demo did not have single f**king problem.
battlechimpNov 30, 2009
Valve did a nasty this year, too. L4D2 was an unjustified sequel. Valve said there was simply too much content to be released in DLC, but TF2 DLC is nearly as much as the entirety of L4D2. Infinity Ward ate it and rumors are Blizzard is going to start charging for Bnet in general.It seems indie developers for the PC are making a pretty good run for a slice of the pie.
nmanguyNov 30, 2009
Stop whining. L4D 2 has more campaigns than the original, has tons of guns and items, more zombies, and has campaign, versus, survival, scavenge and realism modes.If someone paid $50 for the first, why would they not pay for more? Me, I waited till it was $25, and plan on doing the same with its sequel.If you keep complaining like this, when a company is giving you a finely polished diamond, then you aren't helping the problem in the gaming industry.
jonsakiNov 30, 2009
@cowieI'm already tired of playing MW2 Mp (ps3) and I got the game on the 22nd, granted I played the Mp for like 30+ hours. But TF2 (xbox) on the other hand, and I only recently started to play it, has like 80+ hours. If I still had my gold membership I'd still be playing it.