The whole debate is over the ambiguity of the use of the software patent, and it's **** like AstralKnob (who know f**k all about what they are s**tting over) who are escalating it, instead of actually doing something to resolve it
Another comment from the Microsoft Mafia.............BURIED !!!What makes Microsoft's "bizniz?" unethical? -"Channel and Partner racketeering (market saturation of Windows). Lock-in dependencies on proprietary software and standards. Corporate guerrilla terrorism using false advertising and shills. Thuggish "enforcement" using bribery, blackmail and sabotage."<a class="user" href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/9b421036a50c14fd">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advoc ...</a>
fapcommanderJul 5, 2009
The whole debate is over the ambiguity of the use of the software patent, and it's **** like AstralKnob (who know f**k all about what they are s**tting over) who are escalating it, instead of actually doing something to resolve it
Closed AccountJul 5, 2009
You Mono lovers have learned NOTHING from the TomTom incident. The Microsoft Mafia can NEVER be trusted.
fapcommanderJul 5, 2009
So what you are saying is you don't want people to use mono because you don't like microsoft, great argument
Closed AccountJul 6, 2009
Fact: Mono is a patent threat.Fact: It must be avoided.Mono is a poisonous creation of the Microsoft/Novell axis.
fapcommanderJul 6, 2009
Fact: you don't know what you are talking about
oomfoofooJul 6, 2009
Those were serious questions. All I asked for was clarification and you couldn't even provide that.
Closed AccountJul 6, 2009
Another comment from the Microsoft Mafia.............BURIED !!!What makes Microsoft's "bizniz?" unethical? -"Channel and Partner racketeering (market saturation of Windows). Lock-in dependencies on proprietary software and standards. Corporate guerrilla terrorism using false advertising and shills. Thuggish "enforcement" using bribery, blackmail and sabotage."<a class="user" href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/9b421036a50c14fd">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advoc ...</a>