photography.nationalgeographic.com — This 100,000-year-old skull was found in a cave in Qafzeh, Israel, along with other fossils, including a horse tooth and burned flints. Cutting-edge techniques were used to date the fossils?revealing that modern humans left Africa much earlier than had been thought, even coexisting with Neanderthals, once believed to be our ancestors.
Jul 15, 2008 View in Crawl 4
sqlserverJul 16, 2008
Well, the crazies have arrived.Lets get something clear:A. There is a ridiculous amount of evidence that you are dead wrong.B. There is NO evidence(besides 2,000 year old fairy tales taken literally) that you are right.C. This SUPPLEMENTS the already found evidence, it does not contradict it.D. This is just 1 more fossil adding to dozens of fossils between humans and our common ancestor with apes.E. There are no gaps that cannot be filled in with simple micro-evolution in almost all major fossil records.(humans, dogs, horses, whales, etc.) Basically all the way from bacteria to you is supported with fossil, genetic, and DNA evidence.F. The majority of Christians are not complete crazy morons like you. YOU are alone. The majority of Christians laugh at you.
boejanglesJul 16, 2008
Lisa (Prehistoric Human Skull) Needs Braces!
Closed AccountJul 17, 2008
------------I thought the Bible had a few eyewitness accounts written in it,-------------Yeah? What "accounts" where those?
Closed AccountJul 17, 2008
Your "response" is not a rebuttal. If you have any disagreements with what I said, state them. Otherwise, would you be so kind as to not click "Submit Comment" next time? Thank you.
yisforyetiJul 17, 2008
In all honesty, Slam, I respect where you're coming from. I think that unlike most of the people who share your views on this particular subject, you actually, genuinely mean well. The reason people react to those views in such a negative manner isn't necessarily because they think you're ignorant or want to tear down your belief system. More likely, they take your unresearched claims about the subject as offensive when compared to their own experience with your area of apparent expertise. That is, religion. Because everyone, EVERYONE, has at some time in their lives, whether they were in mortal danger, falling in love, or just high off their t**s, has thought about God in a very serious way. Even the atheists. Hell, probably them more than most. It might not have been in the context of a belief system that has one name or the other, but they thought about it. The same can't be said of the science surrounding the theory of evolution. So, please, be polite and give it some consideration. Do some reading that goes deeper than the articles that get posted on this website. Then make your arguments if you still want to.
flashback99Jul 20, 2008
The bible is work of fiction. Contains NO self-checking mechanisms like science has.Burning bushes, people coming back to life, water turning into wine, this called the IMAGINATION.The bible is irrelevant to today and I struggle to find it's relevance anywhere in history apart from all the wars caused by people who fought over it.It's a work of fiction just like harry potter. If you take it seriously there is something WRONG with you.Just because 10 people agree with you doesnt mean you are right, it means that there are 11 people who have something desperately WRONG with their reasoning ability.This especially true if you've already seen the evidence for evolution. You're wrong, plain an simple, and no amount of arguing and meandering is going to make god real or the bible true.
wunkstaAug 15, 2008
wow, i thought a paleontologist would have better grammar. i guess ill have to take your word for it that its impossible.