drumsnwhistles.com — Norwich Bulletin Oozes Intellectual Dishonesty in Amero Case. Quote: "Children were exposed to six hours of Internet pornography under Amero’s watch." The gist of their editorial states that Julie Amero alone should bear criminal responsibility for porn on school computer. The Bulletin twists the facts & ignores reality of the trial.
Mar 26, 2007 View in Crawl 4
mstrikeMar 27, 2007
I've been making the bald man spit to elicit images since age 7 when I found my father's "holy shrine" underneath his underwear in the dresser.
Closed AccountMar 27, 2007
What about Mrs Palm and her 5 sexy daughters?? Were they there too?
starchMar 27, 2007
Agreed. What has the New London Day written about this whole ordeal?
cirienoMar 27, 2007
@ truguyaneseJust a note but: you've not pointed out that you realise Linux69's "magazine" statements were a direct quote from the article. You did read the article, in full, before commenting?
henwoodMar 27, 2007
Whilst it isn't fair on the teacher, it was stupid of her not to just turn off her monitor/ computer, particularly if it was happening all day.
dustin00Mar 30, 2007
This poor woman has to wait another month to be cleared of these charges?The incompetancy just keeps growing.
bofh2Apr 12, 2007
Are you serious?
cogitaMay 24, 2007
Very strange. I'm surprised.