I see we have some "serious" poli-mathematicians aboard this morn. Let's cast aside personal political cand choices fer a sec and consider why it might serve the Amer public to hear all the declared cands' opinions`n´planks: 1)A quick review of Amer pol history shows two-party elections can be easily fractured into real & varied choices. 2)Despite the shrieking of Dems/Repubs, there are cands who offer real change fr/biz-as-usual & who ought rightfully to be heard. Are we so fearful of allowing the Amer political landscape to be a marketplace of ideas? Let the electorate decide!
One year ago, I wasn't a Libertarian either. But if your truly a free-thinker you know what it takes to be convinced and both myself and Bob Barr have come into the fold of Liberty and have turned our backs on the Communism of the Left and the Theocracy of the Right.
How is opposing illegal immigration un-libertarian? We can't just let everyone into our welfare state. What is the point of having borders or laws if we don't enforce them?
"I haven't watched tv in years and I can tell you I would never vote for a piece of trash like Bob Barr."Just shows you don't have to watch TV to be ignorant.
The Repugnantcans and Demopugnantcans have created laws requiring third party candidates to HIRE signature workers to collect hundreds of thousands of signatures JUST TO BE ALLOWED ON THE BALLOTS. Oklahoma and Virginia have ruled Barr will NOT be allowed on their ballot due to dirty pool played by local Repugs there. Nader was only on 35 state ballots in 04' while Badnarik (the Libertarian candidate you weren't alllowed to hear about) was on 48 yet was arrested along with the Green Party canidate, David Cobb, when they tried to stop the illegal Bi-partisan Presidential debate with a court summons. You all heard about that right? Two-Presidential candidates arrested 2 weeks before the elections? Oh wait, NO ONE DID!!! That's because the complicit media to our corrupt government controls it brainwashing all you people who still actually believe the government A) Has your best interests at heart and B) Is telling you the truth and C) Isn't controlled by New World Order bankers who want to control the world. Vote for the ONLY ethical party while we still can, LIBERTARIAN!The last 3rd Party Candidate elected was Abraham Lincoln when few knew what a Republican was!
The people that say that Bush is single-handedly responsible for the pathetic state of this country are ridiculous. The inaction of the democratic run congress gives those of us who actually did consider voting democrat when Hillary was in the race a good idea of what we can expect if we elect Comrade Obama to the office of President. In Missouri, 33% of voters came out to vote for the office of Gov. 33% is pathetic. The same schmucks that are screaming "change, change, change" are the same jack-legs that stay home when someone who could actually change their immediate outlook is running for office. They are also quick to try to find a candidate who will promise them a handout rather than getting off their lazy, stupid brains and making a difference in their own lives.
bob would be a great addition to the debates. There's no comparison to Nader here...Nader is useless and just a vote stealer, Bob Barr actually has good ideas and good things worth listening to.
It's the largest third party, it's the party most closely aligned with the principles the US was founded on, and if you compare the platforms of the various parties the importance of including the Libertarians in at least one of the nationally televised debates (versus, say, Nazis or socialists) becomes self-evident.
kjeffvAug 20, 2008
I see we have some "serious" poli-mathematicians aboard this morn. Let's cast aside personal political cand choices fer a sec and consider why it might serve the Amer public to hear all the declared cands' opinions`n´planks: 1)A quick review of Amer pol history shows two-party elections can be easily fractured into real & varied choices. 2)Despite the shrieking of Dems/Repubs, there are cands who offer real change fr/biz-as-usual & who ought rightfully to be heard. Are we so fearful of allowing the Amer political landscape to be a marketplace of ideas? Let the electorate decide!
libertarian418Aug 21, 2008
One year ago, I wasn't a Libertarian either. But if your truly a free-thinker you know what it takes to be convinced and both myself and Bob Barr have come into the fold of Liberty and have turned our backs on the Communism of the Left and the Theocracy of the Right.
ee80Aug 22, 2008
How is opposing illegal immigration un-libertarian? We can't just let everyone into our welfare state. What is the point of having borders or laws if we don't enforce them?
flip2tripAug 24, 2008
"I haven't watched tv in years and I can tell you I would never vote for a piece of trash like Bob Barr."Just shows you don't have to watch TV to be ignorant.
Closed AccountAug 25, 2008
"Bob Barr has flipped on every issue"Proof or STFU
radracerAug 27, 2008
The Repugnantcans and Demopugnantcans have created laws requiring third party candidates to HIRE signature workers to collect hundreds of thousands of signatures JUST TO BE ALLOWED ON THE BALLOTS. Oklahoma and Virginia have ruled Barr will NOT be allowed on their ballot due to dirty pool played by local Repugs there. Nader was only on 35 state ballots in 04' while Badnarik (the Libertarian candidate you weren't alllowed to hear about) was on 48 yet was arrested along with the Green Party canidate, David Cobb, when they tried to stop the illegal Bi-partisan Presidential debate with a court summons. You all heard about that right? Two-Presidential candidates arrested 2 weeks before the elections? Oh wait, NO ONE DID!!! That's because the complicit media to our corrupt government controls it brainwashing all you people who still actually believe the government A) Has your best interests at heart and B) Is telling you the truth and C) Isn't controlled by New World Order bankers who want to control the world. Vote for the ONLY ethical party while we still can, LIBERTARIAN!The last 3rd Party Candidate elected was Abraham Lincoln when few knew what a Republican was!
pjwritesAug 28, 2008
AlextheK, I hate to ask you to eat your words, but would you like fries with that? hahahah. See today's news and then bon appetit!
jwydraAug 31, 2008
sign the petition to open the debates<a class="user" href="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/presidential_debates/">http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/presidential_de ...</a>
mdawdyAug 31, 2008
The people that say that Bush is single-handedly responsible for the pathetic state of this country are ridiculous. The inaction of the democratic run congress gives those of us who actually did consider voting democrat when Hillary was in the race a good idea of what we can expect if we elect Comrade Obama to the office of President. In Missouri, 33% of voters came out to vote for the office of Gov. 33% is pathetic. The same schmucks that are screaming "change, change, change" are the same jack-legs that stay home when someone who could actually change their immediate outlook is running for office. They are also quick to try to find a candidate who will promise them a handout rather than getting off their lazy, stupid brains and making a difference in their own lives.
bbtwebSep 5, 2008
bob would be a great addition to the debates. There's no comparison to Nader here...Nader is useless and just a vote stealer, Bob Barr actually has good ideas and good things worth listening to.
fausticusSep 25, 2008
It's the largest third party, it's the party most closely aligned with the principles the US was founded on, and if you compare the platforms of the various parties the importance of including the Libertarians in at least one of the nationally televised debates (versus, say, Nazis or socialists) becomes self-evident.