torrentfreak.com — During the Pirate Bay trial Monique Wadsted represented several major movie studios and called for a ?very significant? prison sentence for the defendants. This didn?t go down particularly well with some Pirate Bay supporters and now, in a retaliatory move, a few of them have now taken down her law firm?s website.
Apr 26, 2009 View in Crawl 4
chugatussinApr 27, 2009
you mess with the people, they will mess with you
c0axm3talApr 27, 2009
Argument Ad Hitlerum is funny, and, as another poster pointed out, it did fulfil Godwin's Law rather neatly.
c0axm3talApr 27, 2009
Indeed, but its so much fun to pretend.
javaroastApr 27, 2009
It's you who doesn't get it. They have everything to do with the IFPI, like took the case. But then again maybe you haven't read the last 30 articles that mentioned that. It's a bit too big to ignore, and makes the claim the they have nothing to do with it ridiculous at the very least. And as I have pointed out people who have nothing to do with piracy are affected by the entertainment industries attacks. But, I'm sure you'll continue to ignore the obvious and respond only with vulgarities and shouting down any opinion that isn't in lockstep with yours. Seems to be what you are good at, but doesn't really help you carry your point any further. By the way your caps lock key seems to be sticking. You should get that looked at.
suricouApr 27, 2009
I don't see any Obama brigade... Not in this article, anyway.
mabsarkApr 27, 2009
"Wait until Net Nuetrality has it's day and tell me how free and open the internet is then.You're narrow minded and irrational. You self righteous about stealing s**t, and your short sightedness will retard the freedom of the communication medium we know as the internet."ISPs will never willingly go for "Net 2.0" because they know thier customers do not want it. The first to try would go bust, because its customers would leave. There wouldn't be a second try. The only way for this to happen is for the government to enforce it, and they would be shown the door just as quick as the ISP.You think I am short sighted and narrow minded, but nothing could be further from the truth.I see ISPs becoming irrelevant and and the rise of the public wireless wide area network.I see the internet being implemented at the heart of government, so every person has an equal say.I see technology that can take a physical object and turn it into a digital object represented by a binary pattern.I see people freely creating, editing, and sharing those binary patterns.I see technology that can take a binary pattern and turn it into a physical object.I see a future where the people are in control.You see a future where the governments and megacorporations are in collusion to oppress the public.You are delusional."But give yourself a pat on the back and continue fighting the good fight.........you know stealing s**t and fancying yourself some kind of neo revolutionary."I don't want or need a pat on the back, and simply don't see what I do as wrong, whatever the law says.Ask yourself these questions:If we had the technology to turn a binary pattern into a physical object, would it be wrong to share those patterns freely?Would it be wrong to share a pattern for a specific model of personal transport?Would it be wrong to share a pattern for a lump of gold?Would it be wrong to share a pattern for food?The path you want to take us down would oppress humanity for the sake of profit.
gandhiiApr 28, 2009
And we are hearing it a lot more in the present from the white house regarding the subject of torture.btw.. peters1023: Read it again, fascism does not require "jew slaughtering" to be fascism. Nazi's maybe fascist, but fascists aren't all Nazis.
gandhiiApr 28, 2009
digg has become that way .... a shame
objectivistMay 4, 2009
The Obama Brigade hasn't got the intelligence to do anything against the bay. Neither do any of the f**k head Rockefellers.
farloxMay 15, 2009
And we all love a good teabagging amirite?