readme.picasa.com — What's New - We fixed a couple of bugs with uploading to Picasa Web Albums- Picasa was crashing in some cases, and there was also a problem with detecting if a user was online. Problems importing into an existing folder, and an import crash bug have been fixed. We also fixed some problems with the Picasa Screensaver, incorrectly rotated thumbn
Aug 26, 2006 View in Crawl 4
webtechAug 26, 2006Submitter
Direct Download:<a class="user" href="http://dl.google.com/picasa/picasaweb-setup-beta.exe">http://dl.google.com/picasa/picasaweb-setup-beta.exe</a>
darkzealot89Aug 27, 2006
This account has been closed by the user
philpriceAug 27, 2006
Thanks for being so precise with the build number, I wasn't sure if Beta3 would be 32.71 or 32.70, or maybe even 32.69 (cheeky!) - but now I can have a restful evening.
jer2eydevil88Aug 27, 2006
I can't wait for a new release, Picasa 2.2 seems kind of laggy when browsing my picture library. Does anyone know of a way to let Picasa delete your pictures for you when you import them off your camera? I use this feature in iPhoto and miss it on my PC.
daffyduckAug 27, 2006
He said please. I'm kinda wishing for a Mac version as well.
vrienduinenAug 27, 2006
MaoaHave you used the new beta. It just shows the folder structure from your disk. It does not change it anymore. So much better than the old way.
wingnut21Aug 27, 2006
Just checked. You're right, my bad about the sharpening. It seems more like "tuning" than an "effect." Too bad you can't play with the values (like the tunings).
wingnut21Aug 28, 2006
I feel the exact opposite, but maybe that's because I used Picasa prior. Seriously, creating an album just to view a slide show of pictures in a folder?
natiaAug 26, 2007
Where can I download Picasa 3?
tobikowSep 11, 2007
I noticed that Picasa 3 is on the Bit torrent network as well, if you're into that sort of thing...
jaakkohSep 3, 2008
"And if you don't want your photos online, don't put them there."That's good to remember. But it's also true that just having a cryptic link to photos is a bit less secure than a separate password .. even if is a static one. Ovbviously it's best if you could share photos to people and require them to authenticate themselves with a personal username-password combinatino (as in e.g. flickr). But the Google way is a hell of a lot more simple yet still providing some level of security. ... in Flickr over 90% of the photos were sometime ago totally public (and I bet that this was much due to the fact that "forcing" e.g. your 60 yo parents, aunties, etc to register to Flickr/Yahoo would be too much hasle.