boycottgizmodo.blogspot.com— Not only did Brian Lam and Gizmodo purposefully deceive long standing readers such as myself about the iPhone, they did a terrible job of covering their tracks. Here's how it all happened.
Dec 18, 2006View in Crawl 4
I think this Marklar has gone too far with his Marklar and should Marklar. Marklar was pretty Marklar about this and it's still a cool Marklar. The dude is a complete Marklar!
So... silly.Seriously? Gizmodo writes about new techy... stuff. Many times very speculative like most other similar blogs. Why did what Brian wrote mean more to anyone than what all the others wrote?
inajeepDec 19, 2006
Sorry, I can't in good conscience digg this. But thank you for the 30 seconds of entertainment.
corbs132Dec 20, 2006
buried, for sheer lameness
wakeboard342Dec 20, 2006
I say we don't....
bprice57Dec 20, 2006
this is stupid, i wouldnt even if the iPhone was from apple. buried.
vicestormcloudDec 20, 2006
I think this Marklar has gone too far with his Marklar and should Marklar. Marklar was pretty Marklar about this and it's still a cool Marklar. The dude is a complete Marklar!
astromekDec 21, 2006
So... silly.Seriously? Gizmodo writes about new techy... stuff. Many times very speculative like most other similar blogs. Why did what Brian wrote mean more to anyone than what all the others wrote?
wyethdigitalDec 31, 2006
Well, if you really want to get technical, the article you're all blindly mocking because Brian told you to (<a class="user" href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/iphoneygate-best-brian-lamgizmodo-hate-blog-ever-digg-it-222810.php)">http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/iphoneygate-best-brian-lamgizmodo-hate-blog-ever-digg-it-222810.php)</a> is more about Gizmodo's facetious article. Who's the one who really "needs to get over it?" Brian, who deliberately wrote a misleading headline, submitted it as a Digg, and once it was buried, resubmitted it *again* with a new URL, and then swapped tags in and out; or the guy who calls him on sloppy and deceptive journalism for Gizmodo's gain? I could care less about an Apple cellphone, but I *do* care about deceptive jounalism, and this whole issue reeks of it. Shame on Brian and Gizmodo.