p2pnet.net— American school teacher Julie Amero, facing jail after being accused of letting students look at online porn during class, is off the hook, for now at least.
Jun 7, 2007View in Crawl 4
After reading many many articles I noticed that the school board is clean. Why is that? They said the software is four months out of date. Should they be held accountable in whole or in part? Shouldn?t sites with questionable content have been blocked? Who is there systems administrator? Why was the software four months out of date? What about the other teacher, janitor, or anyone that had access to that computer or the network? The information that has been reported isn't enough. I have had my computer infected with porn pop-ups just by doing a search for a website and clicking on a link that looked like what I was searching for just to find out that it was a porn site and I had to shut down my computer because the pop-ups would not stop. When I restarted my computer I found that my internet browser had been hijacked. I try to open my browser and porn pop-ups start again. What is needed in this case is a third party computer security agency or two, which IS NOT hired by either side but by the court. The court should be interested in truth and justice. The lawyers might have started out with this in their heads but, come on; they are in it for the money. If you don?t agree with that part then explain to me why they cost so bloody much? Did Julie Amero go to those websites or was it a link that she or anyone that had access to the computer clicked? It could have even been a student. Any self respecting student on finding out that they are getting a substitute teacher is going to do their part to make their stay in the classroom a living hell with jokes, pranks, lies, and acting out. Unless of course the sub is really cute. If we had internet in the classroom when I was going to school I would have done something like this to my teachers. As far back as I can remember the teacher never stayed in the classroom or at their desk the entire class and it only takes a few seconds to type in a web address, close the browser and run back to your chair or sit there innocently before the teacher comes back in or returns to their desk. Back in the day we had to settle with fixing their chairs, desk drawers, hiding their books, making noises, passing notes, and later on moving their cars or picking the cars up with a couple of friends and turning them sideways so they would have to wait till another teacher pulled out before they could move their car. Now, with internet in the classrooms kids have so many more tools to terrorize their poor teachers. Trojans, pop-ups, viruses, joke programs, password stealers, it?s almost endless. Before anyone jumps down my throat for blaming the kids, I?M NOT BLAMING THEM. I?m just pointing out that it could be done and if there is anyone reading this that is in school, DON?T DO ANYTHING I MENTIONED IN HERE. Did she do it? I don?t know. Is the school board looking for a scapegoat? Could be. Is it possible someone else could have gone to a site that caused all this? Very likely but, unknown.
antariesJun 7, 2007
After reading many many articles I noticed that the school board is clean. Why is that? They said the software is four months out of date. Should they be held accountable in whole or in part? Shouldn?t sites with questionable content have been blocked? Who is there systems administrator? Why was the software four months out of date? What about the other teacher, janitor, or anyone that had access to that computer or the network? The information that has been reported isn't enough. I have had my computer infected with porn pop-ups just by doing a search for a website and clicking on a link that looked like what I was searching for just to find out that it was a porn site and I had to shut down my computer because the pop-ups would not stop. When I restarted my computer I found that my internet browser had been hijacked. I try to open my browser and porn pop-ups start again. What is needed in this case is a third party computer security agency or two, which IS NOT hired by either side but by the court. The court should be interested in truth and justice. The lawyers might have started out with this in their heads but, come on; they are in it for the money. If you don?t agree with that part then explain to me why they cost so bloody much? Did Julie Amero go to those websites or was it a link that she or anyone that had access to the computer clicked? It could have even been a student. Any self respecting student on finding out that they are getting a substitute teacher is going to do their part to make their stay in the classroom a living hell with jokes, pranks, lies, and acting out. Unless of course the sub is really cute. If we had internet in the classroom when I was going to school I would have done something like this to my teachers. As far back as I can remember the teacher never stayed in the classroom or at their desk the entire class and it only takes a few seconds to type in a web address, close the browser and run back to your chair or sit there innocently before the teacher comes back in or returns to their desk. Back in the day we had to settle with fixing their chairs, desk drawers, hiding their books, making noises, passing notes, and later on moving their cars or picking the cars up with a couple of friends and turning them sideways so they would have to wait till another teacher pulled out before they could move their car. Now, with internet in the classrooms kids have so many more tools to terrorize their poor teachers. Trojans, pop-ups, viruses, joke programs, password stealers, it?s almost endless. Before anyone jumps down my throat for blaming the kids, I?M NOT BLAMING THEM. I?m just pointing out that it could be done and if there is anyone reading this that is in school, DON?T DO ANYTHING I MENTIONED IN HERE. Did she do it? I don?t know. Is the school board looking for a scapegoat? Could be. Is it possible someone else could have gone to a site that caused all this? Very likely but, unknown.