I agree 100% with azyuwish. If this presidential election comes down to brokering a deal to see who goes to the conventions, becomes nominee, and is finally elected president, it will "business as usual", not the desires of the voters. It seems with each sequential presidential election, the voters lose more and more of their influence. If this continues, then who's to say they just won't use "super-delegates" and dismiss the "electoral college" in electing a president.
gbudavidFeb 17, 2008
But like in N M the fix is in
skypilot1973Feb 17, 2008
I agree 100% with azyuwish. If this presidential election comes down to brokering a deal to see who goes to the conventions, becomes nominee, and is finally elected president, it will "business as usual", not the desires of the voters. It seems with each sequential presidential election, the voters lose more and more of their influence. If this continues, then who's to say they just won't use "super-delegates" and dismiss the "electoral college" in electing a president.