redstate.com — In his moral universe, he weighs the morally difficult practice of authorizing aggressive (but ultimately unharmful) interrogation of terrorists to gain vital intel, versus his sworn duty to protect and defend America, and finds the solution simple.
Apr 22, 2009 View in Crawl 4
jadedbypoliticsApr 22, 2009
Well of course it is preferable in the leftist view it would be moral relativism. We have killed 10's of thousands of Jihadi's in the Middle East and what are a few thousand L.A'er's. They are sick and twisted which is why they flow left instead of RIGHT!
tomasiiApr 27, 2009
My values would say protect the lives of thousands of Americans rather than the rights of a few terrorists.
novaculusApr 27, 2009
Perhaps Dear Leader is aking the wrong slant on the politics. Remember this one?:Dr. Venkman: "If we're wrong, we go to jail---peacefully, quietly. We'll enjoy it! But if I'm right, and we can stop this thing, Lenny, you will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters."Maybe they figure voters in LA would rather be dead than have anyone commit the atrocity of pouring water on a mass-murdering terrorist's head in order to save them.
Closed AccountApr 30, 2009
You've have got to be kidding.