nypost.com— The health bills in Congress rob you of your constitutional rights. Here are five provisions (of many) that fail the constitutionality test and reveal Congress's disrespect for the public.....
Jan 8, 2010View in Crawl 4
The fallacy of claims of an ad hominem attack is most often committed by those who accuse their opponents of ad hominem, since they try to dismiss the opposition not by engaging with their arguments, but by claiming that they resort to personal attacks.Is it true that Introducing an impressive-sounding Latin term somehow gives one the decisive edge in an argument?Avoir une belle journée d'hiver.
Where was the SCOTUS during the patriot act? Is the SCOTUS even relevant anymore as a check of the other branches of gov? We need state and jury nullification.
Nothing this government does is unconstitutional. That "general welfare" clause in the constitution means they can do whatever they want....even force you to buy more expensive health insurance or risk going to jail. It's for your own good and they know better than you, omnipotently.Do what they tell you, knuckledragger.
Well, then you shouldn't behave like one. I say I'm not a murder, but if behaved like one and killed someone, wouldn't I be?"Amazing how Hussein Obama promised miraculous changes as soon as he took office. A year into his reign he has done nothing but f**k things up. Yet all you libtard socialists make excuses for him. It's all Bush's fault. Right n" (sic) "<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/CQ_Obama_s_Winning_Streak_On_Hill_Unprecedented?t=30377486#c30398254" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/politics/CQ_Obama_s_Winning_Streak ...</a>If defending Bush the 2nd isn't the true colors of a GOPer, who else defends him?Also, whenever you want to present links to your claimed "facts" go ahead and do so.
aadyssJan 9, 2010
The fallacy of claims of an ad hominem attack is most often committed by those who accuse their opponents of ad hominem, since they try to dismiss the opposition not by engaging with their arguments, but by claiming that they resort to personal attacks.Is it true that Introducing an impressive-sounding Latin term somehow gives one the decisive edge in an argument?Avoir une belle journée d'hiver.
tmbrownJan 10, 2010
Occuptuation of a Constitutional lawyer = constitutional suberversion. Its been that way since Alexander Hamilton.
tmbrownJan 10, 2010
Where was the SCOTUS during the patriot act? Is the SCOTUS even relevant anymore as a check of the other branches of gov? We need state and jury nullification.
juicebagJan 11, 2010
/digg/ - Libertarian Circlejerk
Closed AccountJan 11, 2010
I would Like to be with you here, but I'm convinced that it will be pushed through, so that those in charge can say " WE WON !"
stromprommerJan 12, 2010
Nothing this government does is unconstitutional. That "general welfare" clause in the constitution means they can do whatever they want....even force you to buy more expensive health insurance or risk going to jail. It's for your own good and they know better than you, omnipotently.Do what they tell you, knuckledragger.
rearlgrantJan 13, 2010
Well, then you shouldn't behave like one. I say I'm not a murder, but if behaved like one and killed someone, wouldn't I be?"Amazing how Hussein Obama promised miraculous changes as soon as he took office. A year into his reign he has done nothing but f**k things up. Yet all you libtard socialists make excuses for him. It's all Bush's fault. Right n" (sic) "<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/CQ_Obama_s_Winning_Streak_On_Hill_Unprecedented?t=30377486#c30398254" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/politics/CQ_Obama_s_Winning_Streak ...</a>If defending Bush the 2nd isn't the true colors of a GOPer, who else defends him?Also, whenever you want to present links to your claimed "facts" go ahead and do so.
rearlgrantJan 13, 2010
Wow, I agree with all three of you.
rearlgrantJan 13, 2010
You apparently cannot read.
jda2002Jan 21, 2010
Right on, the rest of Journalism is horrible.