"never heard of it till your post"It was very popular here in the UK during the early to mid 1980s. I'm not sure if it was ever sold abroad. It was quite bulky and there was a lot of wasted space inside the casing, i presume because the casing was intended to fit a monitor on top of it.I bought a second processor - 2 x 6502s in total running at a massive 2MHz :-D
@chrisjs169: In the Microsoft world, \n is the same as \r\n. However, if I had to guess, I'd say Jason wrote that for a UNIX compiler, so you're probably right. That doesn't mean thisthatwhat is wrong, though.
quakeiiiAug 1, 2009
Your mother performs a great strip.
balancingactAug 3, 2009
"never heard of it till your post"It was very popular here in the UK during the early to mid 1980s. I'm not sure if it was ever sold abroad. It was quite bulky and there was a lot of wasted space inside the casing, i presume because the casing was intended to fit a monitor on top of it.I bought a second processor - 2 x 6502s in total running at a massive 2MHz :-D
masterrAug 3, 2009
I like bash.for each in `seq 500`; do echo "I will not throw paper airplanes in class."; done;
masterrAug 3, 2009
for each in `seq 500`; do echo "I will not throw paper airplanes in class."; done;
createthefutureAug 3, 2009
@chrisjs169: In the Microsoft world, \n is the same as \r\n. However, if I had to guess, I'd say Jason wrote that for a UNIX compiler, so you're probably right. That doesn't mean thisthatwhat is wrong, though.