news.bostonherald.com — Each year its competitors add new features to their mid-range mp3 players, making already good products that much better. But then September rolls along and the iPod nano undergoes a redesign that puts it just out of reach at the top of the class.
Sep 27, 2008 View in Crawl 4
umboloSep 27, 2008
You're a double agent.
mmaster23Sep 27, 2008
You mean YP .. not yepYP-K3 ftw! (altough I only use my iPhone these days)
cthellisSep 28, 2008
It's actually another release to get the line back to what the people prefer. And hey, nicer screens aren't a bad thing.It's not like you're forced to upgrade or anything... it's just making the nano better.
mouthymadnessSep 29, 2008
@zsigI encode all my CD's in Apple Lossless, so yes I would need that much. Currently my 80GB classic has 26GB left as it is. And my library is ever expanding.
mouthymadnessSep 29, 2008
I like my racial iPod Classic thank you.
zsigSep 30, 2008
I would say you're in the minority then. Most headphones wouldn't be able to produce distinguishably different sound when comparing the lossless format to a regular MP3. Unless you spend over a $100, but then you're even further off, because you look like a dork walking around with earmuffs on.
igorekwebJun 5, 2011
http://www.indecis.com.ua/
http://www.voyage-crimea.com/
http://www.salamandra.crimea.ua/
http://www.celitel.in.ua/
http://www.midpack.com.ua/
http://www.lozaua.com/
http://www.aromaua.com/
http://www.parfumi.com.ua/