zogby.com — Gee, I guess over time the whole "9 guys with boxcutters managed to somehow halt NORAD from immediately scrambling jets" story has worn a little thin over the years. Come on people, this is even worse than the nutjobs who had the audacity to question the "magic bullet" theory, and we all know that time and science have proven that one true!
Sep 6, 2007 View in Crawl 4
clockerbobSep 7, 2007
The only bad thing about this is what these cornered rats might do as we back them into a corner and destroy their ridiculous lie with science and common sense...they are capable of terrible acts to protect their 'war on terror'.
carreauSep 7, 2007
Quintiere has made it clear that he doesn't support the controlled demolition hypothesis; there are virtually no structural engineers who support the controlled demolition hypothesis and Loose Change is a disingenuous piece of crap. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, I fully support a new, independent investigation into 9/11. Whilst Quintiere doesn't support the controlled demolition hypothesis, he has positively slammed the NIST report and called on his peers to "become conspiracy theorists, but in a proper way." It's been six years since 9/11 and NIST still hasn't explained why WTC7 fell the way it did (as distinct from why it fell)? That's unacceptable.The powers-that-be can afford to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on the war on terror, but they can't cough up a paltry million or so for a new, independent probe into 9/11, which (if everything happened as they say it did) would smear egg all over the faces of the "truthers" and get people behind the war again? Hell, all they have to do to make the "thruthers" look stupid is release clear, verifiable video footage of the plane that hit the pentagon and they won't even do that! The pieces may not fit together in the way that the conspiracy theorists contend, but something is definitely amiss.
jigorokanoSep 7, 2007
The fact that there is no evidence of a conspiracy just goes to show how effective the conspiracy is.
seethispassSep 7, 2007
PNAC claimed that what they needed was (9/11) they also had the means motive and power to create the act.It would only have taken PNAC and the _ heads_ of two or three departments of government to carry it off. No one questions "matters of national security". They can get away with 9/11 All they need is a National Security Letter to keep you or anyone else silent. Many have been silenced.
seethispassSep 8, 2007
Come on out and fight you could learn a lot.
ohio1965Sep 10, 2007
It's very simple: faced with so many unanswered questions why isn't the press investigating? That tells me right there the press is totally bought by this government and is proof that the official story IS the conspiracy!!Where is the press that made sure government stayed in check? Remember Watergate, Iran-contra, etc... Now not a single major media dares question the official story. well sure between conservative Murdoch buying every media in this country, second is GE (the largest arms contractor) owning NBC, CNBC, etc..., third Clear Channel and the lists goes on...