openleft.com — Candidates in both parties with the strongest stance on a free and open internet - Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee - won in Iowa on Thursday. This is a sound repudiation of the telecom lobbyist candidates: Clinton and Romney. It's also a bipartisan consensus for an open internet, foreshadowed by the Moveon/Christian Coalition alliance in 2006.
Jan 5, 2008 View in Crawl 4
lostangelonlineJan 7, 2008
totally agree with deadmoo. N.N. is just the first step for government to take control over the internet, as it is the only "media" left uncontrolled by the establishment. dont take only my word for it, google it, do your own investigation
lostangelonlineJan 7, 2008
NN is a simple regulation, cause more regulation would had no change to convince people to let government in.... yet still is a REGULATION, no matter how small, it lets government police on ISPs, and if government doesnt like an ISP, that ISP will vanish in no time.... once you let government in (and big corporations have big influence in our gov.) only the big ISP will be happy about it
peppermintpigJan 7, 2008
Vektuz: "Could you please tell me what the definition of is is???"
double3344Jan 8, 2008
Agreed maiku00 -- no understanding of it, period. --- > www.savetheinternet.orgLet me ask you somthing: Would Ron Paul be a viable candidate if the telecoms were filtering the information on the internet?Seriously! Ron Paul is THE internet candidate, and now all you misinformed freemarket folks don't care to realize that network neutrality will preserve the FREE MARKET.Geez.
mojotakerJan 8, 2008
Don't count Your Eggs before they Hatch. You know by now saying something, is different from doing something. I support Obama, He is my candidate. But from Experience i don't fully trust anyone until action is taken.
noodsJan 10, 2008
Yay big government!