blog.lewrockwell.com — "Neoconservative writer Dinesh D'Souza, who recently debated Congressman Ron Paul concerning the Iraq War, claims Paul is not a real libertarian. Real libertarians, D'Souza says, spread the universal message of human liberty at the point of a bayonet.
Jul 11, 2007 View in Crawl 4
jeffdaiellJul 11, 2007
That D'Souza debated Dr. Paul shows that the Beltway crowd is worried about the Paul campaign. But even a Ron Paul presidency would not be enough to root out authoritarianism. We need to elect Libertarians to Congresss, as governors, as State legislators, as county commissioners, as city councilmembers, as school board trustees. -- Jeff Daiell
fsprebelJul 11, 2007
The difference between the 2 is that DD is payed to play the neo-conme game while Paul is just being a great American, someone the Founding Fathers would be proud of. I used to respect DD, but he just lost me. What a sellout. Gee, I wonder who he's gonna vote for? He agrees with Paul on everything but the war but will still vote for Rudy McRomney.
wintermdJul 11, 2007
spam
jayhawk05Jul 11, 2007
Actually it's on par with every social neo-conservative (fascist) calling everyone who disagrees with them a liberal. There's nothing wrong with being a conservative. Social neo-conservatives are not conservatives though; they are radical right wing extremists who are pushing their radical right wing agenda (which really boils down to their own form of fascism). If you are a true conservative, you want to maintain the status quo and avoid big changes. That's what true conservatism is.
jayhawk05Jul 11, 2007
Alegoo, thank you for proving my point.