@Shoebox639There is more than one frame of reference, yes?Occam’s Razor can be applied to anything, and its usefulness hinges on the set of available information, of which there is an enormous amount (for those INTERESTED in looking at it).I'm sure the idea that the earth was actually a sphere blew the minds of some people back in the day. If you apply Occulm's Razor to 9/11 given ALL of the available information, the "official story" unravels like dust in the wind. Do you believe it was just a "coincidence" that the military was running drills where aircraft were simulating the behavior of hijacked airliners on 9/11?<a class="user" href="http://www.oilempire.us/wargames.html">http://www.oilempire.us/wargames.html</a>Was it also just a “coincidence” that with respect to the London Bombings, a fictional "scenario" of multiple bomb attacks on London's underground took place at exactly the same time as the bomb attack on July 7, 2005?<a class="user" href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050808&articleId=821">http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vie ...</a>So, Occam’s Razor: "the explanation for something that requires the least assumptions and is the simplest is almost always the right one."So, we've got the "coincidences” (not!), we can see who serves to GAIN by furthering an agenda of militarization, we've got the means to execute AND cover up the actions through compartmentalization and economic power,... and all of this points to state sponsored false flag terror. I believe:1) Truth is stranger than fiction.2) There are no coincidences.Now, if a person isn’t looking for correspondences, motivations, following the money trail, or considering who's to gain,... they aren't being objective. We cannot ASSUME anything in a real investigation, and least of all that any one entity is necessarily telling the truth, even IF they are in a position of power."Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. I feel it also appropriate to point out that the "official story" actually doesn't even apply anymore, given that a number of the supposed original 19 high-jackers are known to be ALIVE:<a class="user" href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html">http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html</a>Social conditioning is doing a real number on people!"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, CIA Director (first staff meeting, 1981)Personally, I feel that it is sad to see so much MANIPULATION occurring, and so much non-transparency in our governments under the pretenses of "national security". If we did things in the light of day, there would be nothing to hide, and people would probably see things more or less in a similar way. But at the end of the day, we all have our own views of the world. Thankfully, everyone has a right to their own opinion, and I certainly respect your views.
"And card your evidence is you saying.....show me evidence?"We've shown you all our evidence...you guys have said it's all bunk. FINE...it's all bunk...now what evidence is there that bin laden did it?"How about the tapes of bin laden speaking about the attacks....before they happened?"OK here's a start...so you have the word of the most wanted terrorist...open and shut case, right? So that's all the evidence you have? Do you honestly think that would stand up in court?If I announced I did it would you believe me?How about John David Karr? Did he kill Jon Benet Ramsey? He admitted it, right?So...is this really all you got? The word of the most wanted terrorist?Powerful "stacks of evidence"! I'm blown away!!!!!!
He's asking that because that's what "officially" happened.Don't you remember the pictures? Strangely enough there's also satellite data from before 9/11 that shows the same mark on the ground.. hmm.
So you can list a whole bunch of examples, but it when it comes to the most corrupt administration in a very long time, we're supposed to look the other way?Look at the evidence, not fairytales like popular mechanics. If you really trust it so much, it can't hurt can it?
rald84Jul 24, 2008
"If they hadn't shot down the fourth plane it would've hit the dome," Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks.wtf?
designnerdJul 24, 2008
A bottle of Whiskey and Tom Thumb.
zaptomanJul 25, 2008
UGH. Bury.
globalistshillJul 25, 2008
@Shoebox639There is more than one frame of reference, yes?Occam’s Razor can be applied to anything, and its usefulness hinges on the set of available information, of which there is an enormous amount (for those INTERESTED in looking at it).I'm sure the idea that the earth was actually a sphere blew the minds of some people back in the day. If you apply Occulm's Razor to 9/11 given ALL of the available information, the "official story" unravels like dust in the wind. Do you believe it was just a "coincidence" that the military was running drills where aircraft were simulating the behavior of hijacked airliners on 9/11?<a class="user" href="http://www.oilempire.us/wargames.html">http://www.oilempire.us/wargames.html</a>Was it also just a “coincidence” that with respect to the London Bombings, a fictional "scenario" of multiple bomb attacks on London's underground took place at exactly the same time as the bomb attack on July 7, 2005?<a class="user" href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050808&articleId=821">http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vie ...</a>So, Occam’s Razor: "the explanation for something that requires the least assumptions and is the simplest is almost always the right one."So, we've got the "coincidences” (not!), we can see who serves to GAIN by furthering an agenda of militarization, we've got the means to execute AND cover up the actions through compartmentalization and economic power,... and all of this points to state sponsored false flag terror. I believe:1) Truth is stranger than fiction.2) There are no coincidences.Now, if a person isn’t looking for correspondences, motivations, following the money trail, or considering who's to gain,... they aren't being objective. We cannot ASSUME anything in a real investigation, and least of all that any one entity is necessarily telling the truth, even IF they are in a position of power."Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. I feel it also appropriate to point out that the "official story" actually doesn't even apply anymore, given that a number of the supposed original 19 high-jackers are known to be ALIVE:<a class="user" href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html">http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html</a>Social conditioning is doing a real number on people!"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, CIA Director (first staff meeting, 1981)Personally, I feel that it is sad to see so much MANIPULATION occurring, and so much non-transparency in our governments under the pretenses of "national security". If we did things in the light of day, there would be nothing to hide, and people would probably see things more or less in a similar way. But at the end of the day, we all have our own views of the world. Thankfully, everyone has a right to their own opinion, and I certainly respect your views.
card51shortJul 26, 2008
"And card your evidence is you saying.....show me evidence?"We've shown you all our evidence...you guys have said it's all bunk. FINE...it's all bunk...now what evidence is there that bin laden did it?"How about the tapes of bin laden speaking about the attacks....before they happened?"OK here's a start...so you have the word of the most wanted terrorist...open and shut case, right? So that's all the evidence you have? Do you honestly think that would stand up in court?If I announced I did it would you believe me?How about John David Karr? Did he kill Jon Benet Ramsey? He admitted it, right?So...is this really all you got? The word of the most wanted terrorist?Powerful "stacks of evidence"! I'm blown away!!!!!!
akufenJul 26, 2008
He's asking that because that's what "officially" happened.Don't you remember the pictures? Strangely enough there's also satellite data from before 9/11 that shows the same mark on the ground.. hmm.
akufenJul 26, 2008
So you can list a whole bunch of examples, but it when it comes to the most corrupt administration in a very long time, we're supposed to look the other way?Look at the evidence, not fairytales like popular mechanics. If you really trust it so much, it can't hurt can it?
akufenJul 26, 2008
Some evidence? My friend, if you haven't encountered any evidence of wrong doing on 9/11, stop trying.