nosocialism.com — The hottest year on record is 1934, not 1998The third hottest year on record was 1921, not 2006Three of the five hottest years on record occurred before 19406 of the top 10 hottest years occurred in the first half of the last century
Jul 7, 2008 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountJul 8, 2008
"....Al Gore's Decree on Global Warming is Not Our Only Crisis..."You're right. It's the U.N., socialism, and enemies of the U.S.. The same elites who loathe the U.S. Constitution and capitalism. Al Gore and most democrats and many republicans included. They push global warming...Uh, I mean 'climate change' in an effort to level the playing field between America and the rest of the world. While every man woman and child ought to be a good steward of the Earth and the environment, the 'Global Warming' cabal uses the unproven theory of global warming as a wedge issue to divide and bully the U.S. and the world into submission.
flip2tripJul 8, 2008
The global warming hoax will do more to discredit scientists than any other claim of the past 100 years because people have bought this tripe and sold it as truth.
greenfyreJul 8, 2008
He read it. He has probably also read Jack and the Beanstalk and Peter Pan. For some odd reason he prefers to tell you about reality and not fairy tales.
tjexJul 8, 2008
I guess all the weather problems that we're experiencing are just a figment of our imagination?
nosocialismJul 9, 2008Submitter
Of Course not, do they want to derail the Theory that's going to give them the 6 Trillion Dollar Carbon Offset Taxing system that will fund them for the next 100 years? I think not.
greenfyreJul 13, 2008
If you spent 1/10th of the time checking your 'facts' as you do making snide remarks you'd save yourself a lot of time.Climate cooling consesnsus - debunked <a class="user" href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/11/23/18534/222">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/11/23/18534/ ...</a> <a class="user" href="http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11643">http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/ ...</a>Pointing out the obvious - your rant goes on for however many words and offers not a single piece of evidence. The whole thing is entirely fact free 'will not cause thought or intelligence'. If the science is wrong, show us where and how it is wrong:"How we know we're not wrong about climate change" <a class="user" href="http://www.ametsoc.org/atmospolicy/Presentations/Oreskes%20Presentation%20for%20Web.pdf">http://www.ametsoc.org/atmospolicy/Presentations/O ...</a>perhaps you can explain why you think the science<a class="user" href="http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/evidence/">http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/evidence/</a><a class="user" href="http://royalsociety.org/landing.asp?id=1278">http://royalsociety.org/landing.asp?id=1278</a><a class="user" href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/05/start-here/">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007 ...</a><a class="user" href="http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm">http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm</a><a class="user" href="http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm">http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm</a><a class="user" href="http://www.ghgonline.org/pubarchive.htm">http://www.ghgonline.org/pubarchive.htm</a>
greenfyreJul 13, 2008
As usual Nav7 offers no evidence for his absurd denial of anthropogenic climate change.If you have evidence, share it.If you have nothing, admit it and stop bothering people.
nosocialismJul 18, 2008Submitter
<a class="user" href="http://www.abd.org.uk/green_myths.htm">http://www.abd.org.uk/green_myths.htm</a>Green Myths On Global Warming ? Debunked1
greenfyreJul 26, 2008
"Is not science a collection"No it's not. As we have told you multiple times before, you are so flamingly clueless about science that your posts are absurd. Just take 1 freaking hour and try to get up to at least a grade 6 level. <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science</a>"I've stated may times how we know for a fact that:"YEs you have, and each time we out the "fact" that you think this means something and somehow climate scientists haven't figured it all into the science, and we even provide links. Obviously you never read them, you just scurry to another thread to post the same nonsense.Well, even if you don't read them there are people on digg who are more interested in facts than in pushing a particular political agenda<a class="user" href="http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics">http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics</a> How to talk to Global Warming Skeptic<a class="user" href="http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462">http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/ ...</a> Climate Change: A guide for the perplexed<a class="user" href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/index/#Responses">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004 ...</a> Response to common contrarian arguments<a class="user" href="http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/debate/climatechange/summary.asp">http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/debate/climate ...</a> Climate change debate summary<a class="user" href="http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/myths/index.html">http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/ ...</a> Climate Change Myths<a class="user" href="http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/anti-global-heating-claims-a-reasonably-thorough-debunking/">http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/ ...</a> A Thorough Debunking<a class="user" href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/">http://www.skepticalscience.com/</a> Skeptical Science<a class="user" href="http://www.logicalscience.com/skeptic_arguments/skeptic-arguments.html">http://www.logicalscience.com/skeptic_arguments/sk ...</a><a class="user" href="http://environment.newscientist.com/climatemyths">http://environment.newscientist.com/climatemyths</a><a class="user" href="http://www.sierraclub.ca/national/programs/atmosphere-energy/climate-change/ten-myths.html">http://www.sierraclub.ca/national/programs/atmosph ...</a><a class="user" href="http://www.desmogblog.com/slamming-the-climate-skeptic-scam">http://www.desmogblog.com/slamming-the-climate-ske ...</a><a class="user" href="http://royalsociety.org/page.asp?id=6229">http://royalsociety.org/page.asp?id=6229</a>The skeptics, who are they <a class="user" href="http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Science/Skeptics.asp">http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Science/ ...</a>Who funds them? <a class="user" href="http://www.enn.com/ecosystems/article/37379">http://www.enn.com/ecosystems/article/37379</a> 92% of "neutral" Eco-skeptics turn out to be industry shills, <a class="user" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/sep/19/ethicalliving.g2">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/sep/19/ ...</a> and <a class="user" href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/exxon-secrets">http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-war ...</a>How did all this come about? see <a class="user" href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/05/manufacturing-uncertainty/">http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/05/manufacturi ...</a>