nist.gov — The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) today released its final report on the Sept. 11, 2001, collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City. The final report is strengthened by clarifications and supplemental text suggested by organizations and individuals worldwide in response to the draft WTC 7
Nov 20, 2008 View in Crawl 4
hortnonNov 21, 2008
How can he (or you for that matter) prove the sounds he heard were bombs?
spaceman77Nov 22, 2008
Why do you assume we are Alex Jones fans?
Closed AccountNov 22, 2008
You're right. I shouldn't have said theories. I should have said lies.
maxtangentNov 23, 2008
Okay let's make this clear. This thread is about WTC7 so how is using information about WTC7 cherry picking? This thread isn't about the other buildings, so i-knob trying to change the topic.Turn this around and ask if it accepts/agrees with this expert's opinions on WTC7 since it dodged the issue then Hypocritically accused me of doing so when I stayed on topic. Trolls like this are hilarious - dodge then accuse you of dodging, change the topic then accuse you of doing so. Without Hypocrisy and Fallacies to rely on, they apparently would have no material at all.Its comment on common sense observations doesn't even make sense other than, once again, being the pot calling the kettle black. If WTC7 came down obviously the way the official story says, or, rather, the way the official story has been re-written repeatedly, then why does i-knob waste its time here trying to convince 'nutjobs' they are crazy?Yes, I just ask questions and point out evidence that seems to have been ignored, spun or just plain gainsayed and let others come to their own conclusions. These Trolls give people the conclusions they want them to have and tell them there's no use looking nor thinking for themselves..So, when i-knob changes the subject to what the expert says on WTC1 and 2, i-knob is not cherry picking evidence, changing the subject nor dodging the question? Spin, deflect, smear and smugly claim victory is a pattern they repeat endlessly. Why bother if they are so 'right' and it's so 'obvious'?As for what I believe, I believe the official story is full of holes and that the investigation, at the very least, was incomplete. I do agree with i-knob when it confesses that it is spewing 'Loaaads of crap' though.
kenedamickNov 25, 2008
What a retard. I do buy that.