911blogger.com — John Gross, one of the lead engineers of the NIST report is questioned about the existence of molten steel at the WTC, the collapse of Building 7, and also explains how the NIST report did not do any analysis of the collapse of all three buildings.
Feb 10, 2007 View in Crawl 4
btbalanceFeb 11, 2007
cuz they did it!!!!
onesidedcookieFeb 11, 2007
This is an interesting tidbit over at the Google Comments of the video."Wow that was pretty pathetic with that last clip there. There would be no reason for them to study what happened during the collapse, because once it collapsed, it was done. The reason why they ignored it is because you can't really do anything about it. Do you think future buildings are somehow going to make collapses go slower or safer? No. They were going to study what STARTED the collapse, not DURING the collapse. Anyone who sees this as a problem doesn't understand science at all.""Check out ImplosionWorld.comThere is an article there written by someone part of the cleanup crew talking about the molton metal. He said the excavator wouldn't be able to pick any molton steel since it would cease to function above 2000 degrees. The melting point of steel is 3000 degrees, and you even admitted that it was just 1500 degrees found.Doublethink."
eggzbFeb 11, 2007
Why is this not on the front page yet? almost 80 diggs in 24 hours more then half of them in the 1st quarter? I dont get the digg system. I see 40s on the main page all the time.
Closed AccountFeb 12, 2007
There was no molten steel at Ground Zero. It's a fabricated story to distract people from what really happened. <a class="user" href="http://911researchers.com/node/147">http://911researchers.com/node/147</a>Anyone who wants to learn what really happened on 9/11, go here: <a class="user" href="http://911researchers.com/">http://911researchers.com/</a>
dhill944Feb 13, 2007
This guy is a corporate drone, he does what he is told the conversation probably went something like this:cointel agent: Hey John, that collapse was really something huh? we need to find how those fires brought a building like that down.John: OK I'll get the team right on it.You see without saying a word (no secret meetings needed) Mr. Gross knew the bounds he was not allowed to cross, every investigation that was started already had a conclusion they needed to reach. Otherwise a new more qualified team would take over. I find it amazing that this guy can not even acknowledge that there are legit concerns over this, his little smirks and dismissive body language messages he sends to the rest of the lecture when "controlled demolision" gets brought up. I want to Thank the people who showed up and asked these questions and I hope Mr. Gross goes to church and asks for forgiveness, silence and willful avoidance of the issues will not work as an excuse when judgement will be done.
Closed AccountMar 6, 2007
There was no molten metal at GZ. It's a fabrication: <a class="user" href="http://www.911researchers.com/node/147">http://www.911researchers.com/node/147</a>
thenativeraverMar 6, 2007
It's so sad that you people can't get on with your life and are still stuck in 2001.
alllieSep 9, 2007
There seems to be a "group" making sure that 9/11 truth stories don't make it to the front page.I wonder if they are hired or freelance.
laobaoSep 23, 2007
Dude, we are not going away. There is no statute of limitations to murder, mass murder, illegal wars and crimes against humanity. Bush and his neocon crew will hang. And when it comes to the trap door on the scaffold, let me "pull it!"