online.wsj.com — Both MySpace and Facebook lost visitors in September, according to Nielsen/NetRatings, a Web-tracking service. The number of unique U.S. visitors at MySpace fell 4% to 47.2 million from 49.2 million in August, and the number of visitors to Facebook fell 12% to 7.8 million from 8.9 million.
Oct 26, 2006 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountOct 26, 2006
Bravo!
aximOct 26, 2006
facebook is a million times better than myspace you dont get retarded spam messages and its still a pretty tight knit set of networks, sounds like some of you have never even used it
darklord5907Oct 26, 2006
I'm thinking that too...
rationalistOct 26, 2006
@Magnus:"yeah, you realize people say they're "99 yrs old" so they can have public profiles, right? to say only 12% of MySpace users are under 18 shows you are a dumbass."Read the actual comment again. At the very outset, I explained that the statistics were NOT drawn from what people state their age is to register on MySpace. They were drawn from actual field research. And I am not the one saying it, the data reported says it. "Dumbass"."because if you mean the code has been cleaned up you frankly don't belong on Digg.com, so go ahead and insult the "average Digg poster" it's cool."What part of "look and feel" don't you understand?Because if you think look and feel refers to code, you frankly don't belong on Digg.com.Double dumbass :-)
wholewheatOct 27, 2006
Notice that in that graph in the article, Friendster's numbers increased as MySpace and Facebook's decreased. Yet the article didn't comment on this phenomenon. It's interesting - could Friendster be stealing away users from the other two?
soupisgoodfoodOct 28, 2006
According to the WSJ graph (and surely such people know what they are doing?), MySpace, Facebook, and Friendster must have started up in September 2005, as the traffic for all 3 of those sites is 0 at that time.
youcandiggitMar 21, 2007
Good riddance. Myspace is childish, anyway.