twitter.com — Murphy-Goode announced their top 50 for their really good job contest. The only problem is that @martinsargent wasn't in it. So, for all those that voted, looks like your votes meant nothing to Murphy-Goode. Forget me, forget you Murphy-Goode!
Jun 26, 2009 View in Crawl 4
its420somewhereJun 27, 2009
their wines suck anyway ... my friend is gonna be pissed, as he was in this contest. Even worse ... these clown shoes sent me an email once they realized their PR stunt went sour! assh**es
chuckley54494Jun 27, 2009
your god. <3 boxed wine.
pinkfloyd2003Jul 1, 2009
<a class="user" href="http://pwnagesauce.ytmnd.com/">http://pwnagesauce.ytmnd.com/</a>
wealdcountryJul 1, 2009
This has to be a huge opportunity for another niche wine maker to step in and hire Marty. Any suggestions? Maybe a few hundred e-mails to the PR departments of other wineries, to make them aware?
tzessin23Jul 10, 2009
I live in SF and visit Napa and Healdsburg regularly.....guess I will never stop at Murphy-Goode again. FYI Dont any my opnion to vote, then show zero interest or care in my requested vote!
ursanJul 10, 2009
Mind you, I didn't post my previous message because Martin was overlooked, but because for a company to ask people to vote & then completely disreguard that vote (*cough*, Iranian election *cough*) doesn't sit well. I kind of agree with Martin who implied that it was more of an email fishing thing than an actual vote.Who knows, maybe they had their choice before they even started the campaign.
g4sucksnowJul 16, 2009
Somebody needs to hack their site. Bring them down!