Users who Dugg This
Rendement Uitgeverij BV
1 Followers
Phil Duffenais
1 Followers
Oscar Mike
170 Followers
Imagepush.to
553 Followers
STartupKart.com
918 Followers
Lipsy D'souza
315 Followers
chrismombergerMay 17, 2008
Cripes! It's just submitting OTHER PEOPLE'S stories on a web site under a fake name! For all the hoopla, if MBM leaves, it won't make a difference to 99% of the people that use Digg.
Closed AccountMay 18, 2008
and still same s**t digg !! I get 5 diggs now i'm back to 0 - wow it's as almost those 5 peeps diggs didn't count for s**t after reading my post and voting for it !! f**king bulls**t !!
skankybaconMay 18, 2008
Who gives a s**t whether MrBabyMan gets a lot of front-page stories?Who gives a s**t when their own submissions aren't dugg?Who gives a s**t whether MrBabyMan does or doesn't keep using Digg?Why the hell is it such a big deal to get a submission on the front page? You going to put it on your resume? Expecting someone to cut you a check? Will it give meaning and purpose to your life? I don't even look at the submitter of articles I read or digg--why should I?In short, who gives a s**t?
trichomonasMay 18, 2008
Ok. You dig the other submission simply because you know that even if you re-submit the piece it won't reach the FP. Now, if you had enough friends on Digg that you thought you had a chance of making the FP would you still not post the story? And no...we don't "all win" if MBM doesn't submit duplicates. Because those duplicates don't make it to the FP and the majority of users don't get to see them. At least when he re-submits stuff we get to see it.
xtrumanxMay 18, 2008
@TrichomonasThe issue with that would be a lot of people complain about getting duped. I'm aware how often he dupes, but I have seen several stories where people complained about getting duped with valid evidence. I really don't care what Babyman's intentions are, if he's in it for the glory of making front page or just wants to spread some cool news, but duplicating stories is a crappy thing to do.Part of the problem in my opinion lays with the digg community where they don't support people who actually have a valid claim at being duped. Everyone here thinks the most appropritate action to take is to tell him to silence and bury him. Personally, if diggers just looked at timestamps after someone claims to have been duped, they should go ahead and digg the original story.
Closed AccountMay 19, 2008
uh who cares
shadusMay 20, 2008
Because some people judge their e-peen size by such things i suppose.
stevenbullenSep 8, 2008
DIGG: <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/world_news/Ban_MrBabyMan_please">http://digg.com/world_news/Ban_MrBabyMan_please</a>The more stories front paged... the more chance kevin rose will clean up this mess that we call MrBabyMan
eightyk88Sep 10, 2008
oops digg it <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/people/digg_since_mrbabyman_was_harassed">http://digg.com/people/digg_since_mrbabyman_was_ha ...</a>
Closed AccountSep 14, 2008
I'm Diggin' it... ban the loser.
slapdedNov 27, 2008
This account has been closed by the user
whitehat51Jan 28, 2010
I buried you because your post essentially said 'bury this if you want MrBabyMan to quit.'
Closed AccountApr 19, 2010
Reading the comments above me I realize digg is full of f**kin' noobs who have no idea that MrBabyMan and his network of power users virtually set the agenda for what makes the front page every day on digg. Why not just rename this site to thingsthatmrbabymanfindsinteresting.com
Closed AccountMay 15, 2010
He needs to stop threats and put it into action if he wants.
mybabybuddyMar 11, 2012
OMG! How cute that it makes us forget how dangerous they can be : )
mybabybuddyMar 11, 2012
Sorry about previous post. I commented on the wrong post.