Users who Dugg This
James Freeman
18 Followers
David Schlesinger
87 Followers
1d1dntdo1tMar 23, 2010
Buried for being kinda dickish.
zbeastMar 23, 2010
well my poor firefox is currently using 1,016,600k and climbing.. I'll give this a try and hope that it fixes the trouble.I love firefox but she's a porker most days.
schnibitzMar 24, 2010
Yeah, I'm beginning to appreciate that.
thekarmapoliceMar 24, 2010
when i enable this add-on i notice that, when typing in text boxes on facebook or digg or wherever, it randomly "clicks out" of the text box so that i'm no longer typing a message. also, when i'm reading an article and using the down arrow to scroll it eventually stops scrolling, as if i clicked out of the window. when i disable memory fox the problems go away. i guess it's clearing some memory that i'm using that tells it which field is active. anyway, it's really inconvenient...anyone else having the same problem?
benodMar 24, 2010
Worked for me. Thanks very much.
valleyman86Mar 24, 2010
Yea I agree Chrome doesn't have the memory footprint I was hoping for but I still have yet to make it use like 2gbs of ram. I did that all the time in Firefox. I love both browsers though. They both have their quirks.
bat_21Mar 24, 2010
Good docs, not good genes.<a class="user" href="http://www.manofest.com/content/images/joomgallery/img_originals/celebrity_36/25_amazing_celebrities_before_and_after_plastic_surgery_196/megan_plasticsurg_20091008_1465677594.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.manofest.com/content/images/joomgallery ...</a>
Closed AccountMar 25, 2010
I like it, but instead Mozilla could have it preinstalled/configured in the next update/version.
themidnighterMar 26, 2010
Same here.Well, 2 weeks ago.
whiztechyMar 28, 2010
Very useful ...Thanks for sharing.
zbeastJun 17, 2010
<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/d31TXyb" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/d31TXyb</a>
squall69rDec 16, 2010
[b]Reality[/b]
Memory Fox's purported Memory leak and freeing capabilities are a lie. Memory Fox uses a standard windows function to flush the process's memory to the page file RESULTING IN WORSE PERFORMANCE.
Any windows developer with an ounce of free thought will realise in an instant that the claims made by the extension author are bogus and the experiences of its users are placebo. Firefox's stability and memory use will differ from session to session, and even between reloadings of the same session, and especially differ between Windows sessions.
The only extension which actually effects real memory usage is the ramback extension which flushes the System memory allocated caches.
Anyone seeking to verify this, can enable the Commit column in task manager or use about:memory.
This review will me going viral.