minnesotaindependent.com — Over 37 million people saw Sarah Palin declare in her acceptance speech that she told Congress, “thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere.” That statement is demonstrably false, but the campaign of Sen. John McCain continues to tout Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s opposition to the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere” despite once linking it to the collap
Sep 9, 2008 View in Crawl 4
pinkslipnationSep 10, 2008
This is what happens when the party that does not believe in government is elected into power. It's all a game and it's all graft and free money sloshing around for them. If there is any doubt what Republican policies will look like, we have the last eight years as an example. These people don't govern, they loot and leverage out every last dime and leave in their wake destruction, death and DEBT DEBT DEBT!
Closed AccountSep 10, 2008
McCain knew Palin 10 min before giving her the job.McCains ability to make huge decisions are not up to snuff. What this proves is that the big decisions in the White House will be made by his inexperienced uneducated, super religious staff.
okzillaSep 10, 2008
"Reported as Innacurate" by McCainiacs in 5... 4... 3... 2....
worlddancerSep 10, 2008
"Thanks, but NO THANKS....to that LIAR from NOWHERE" (credit to comments on DK)
Closed AccountSep 10, 2008
348 diggs and 1 bury and this is not on the front page?<a class="user" href="http://www.ajaxonomy.com/buryrecorder/">http://www.ajaxonomy.com/buryrecorder/</a>
johnnr2Sep 10, 2008
FTA = Days after the 35W bridge collapse John McCain connected that $233 million with the tragedy that claimed 13 lives in Minneapolis.“Maybe if we had done it right, maybe some of that money would have gone to inspect those bridges and other bridges around the country,” McCain said at a campaign stop in Ankeny, Iowa on Aug. 4, 2007. “Maybe the 200,000 people who cross that bridge every day would have been safer than spending $233 million of your tax dollars on a bridge in Alaska to an island with 50 people on it.”One month after McCain’s critical comments Palin changed her position on the bridge, citing the project’s high cost to Alaskans, while continuing to defend the project.