users.dma.ucla.edu— Just an overlay image of the new Lakota Nation. It's way up there, where there's nothing much interesting going on.
Dec 20, 2007View in Crawl 4
Imperialism is a bitch ain't it, while the British army was there most of the major victories went militia groups made up of canadian immigrants and members of the first nations. Remember the brits would walk through a forest in bright red uniforms, you could spot them, shot them without really revealing your position. god they were dumb.
first you said the earth owns the land, now you say the govt owns the land. which is it? i own the land, daffy duck owns this house and this land! i paid for it and i paid taxes on it. i have the deed, so it is mine. go back to your box hippy. oh and it's "you're" not "your." it's a contraction of "you are."
I don't think you actually understand what's going on here. The Lakota nation has ALWAYS been there. Thats where they live. And where did you get the idea that they are seceding?
When Montana secedes then it will be part of a new union with the Lakota nation. We might be able to include Alaska since they're also talking of seceding. A new confederation.
monkeyrunDec 21, 2007
lol, they single handedly saved the real-estate market in those 5 states.
haterofps3Dec 21, 2007
Imperialism is a bitch ain't it, while the British army was there most of the major victories went militia groups made up of canadian immigrants and members of the first nations. Remember the brits would walk through a forest in bright red uniforms, you could spot them, shot them without really revealing your position. god they were dumb.
scrappy1850Dec 21, 2007
first you said the earth owns the land, now you say the govt owns the land. which is it? i own the land, daffy duck owns this house and this land! i paid for it and i paid taxes on it. i have the deed, so it is mine. go back to your box hippy. oh and it's "you're" not "your." it's a contraction of "you are."
Closed AccountDec 22, 2007
Over 700 comments. Now that's impressive.
rossini22Jan 1, 2008
we are all relatedDoesn't north-western Kansas belong to Lakota ?<a class="user" href="http://www.crystalinks.com/lakotamap.gif">http://www.crystalinks.com/lakotamap.gif</a>
jonmon6691Jan 17, 2008
I don't think you actually understand what's going on here. The Lakota nation has ALWAYS been there. Thats where they live. And where did you get the idea that they are seceding?
tomwestbrookMay 7, 2009
When Montana secedes then it will be part of a new union with the Lakota nation. We might be able to include Alaska since they're also talking of seceding. A new confederation.