mediamatters.org — You have to read this to believe it... In her 10/24 nationally syndicated column, noting recent coverage by the Los Angeles Times and the New York Post of contributions to Hillary Clinton?s presidential campaign by Asian-Americans, right-wing pundit Michelle Malkin referred to ?Hillary campaign contributors? who were ?smellier than stinky tofu.?
Oct 24, 2007 View in Crawl 4
pintomp3Oct 25, 2007
michelle maglalang malkin hates asian people almost as much as clarence thomas hates black people.
charlotte_webOct 25, 2007
Context:---------------------------------------- In the wake of eye-opening investigations by the New York Post and Los Angeles Times of more dubious foreign funny money flowing into Hill's coffers, ethnic grievance organizations are stepping forward to condemn these stories as examples of "negligent journalism." Yep. The newspapers are guilty of "negligence" because they actually broke news instead of covering it up.Both papers uncovered dishwashers, cooks and other suspect Hillary campaign contributors in New York's Chinatown, Flushing, the Bronx and Brooklyn who were limited-income, limited-English-proficient and smellier than stinky tofu. One Asian donor admitted to the Los Angeles Times "to lacking the legal-resident status required for giving campaign money." Another, Hsiao Wen Yang, told the New York Post she was reimbursed for her $1,000 donation -- setting off clear alarm bells over yet another possible straw donor scheme on the heels of Norman Hsu-gate.
eviltrollOct 25, 2007
There's nothing racist about the comment, regardless whether some hyper-sensitive race-baiters want to insist she's a racist. Racism has been watered down so much that it can be falsely applied to anything these days. Its basically lost all meaning since no two people define it the same way.