Users who Dugg This
www.Pokerisk.com
13 Followers
PokerisFree
6 Followers
Chuck Wendie
0 Followers
yori misori
311 Followers
♥Casino "Irish" Lady♥
324 Followers
BldrLv OPX
17 Followers
Online Casino MPC
127 Followers











screensnotOct 18, 2007
Check out hand 14.PR (Potripper) is UTG and dealt 84o. There are two 8s and two 4s in the other players hole cards (leaving one 8 and one 4 in the deck). The BB is dealt KK (a hand that will almost certainly raise, and would not easily be bluffed). There is a KJ behind him, increasing the odds of a raise. But PR limps in. After the inevitable raise, PR folds.If you knew the other players hole cards, and were thinking clearly, you wouldn't invest a dime in that pot. Would you?
xtc46Oct 18, 2007
really? because hold'em was one of the last ways I learned to play poker (I suck at all things poker related) and am far less than even an ameture.
yndyOct 18, 2007
actually, Dax420 is not accurate - the reason programmer's don't trust 'online' or even 'computer' gambling (include those vile little quater poker draw machines all over Vegas) is that they know how hard it is to simulate actual 'random numbers' with a computer... and so most coders cheat and get by with the bare minimum when it comes to having to code 'randomness' in.Unless you're running a massive algorithm that determines the random number based on variable random user inputs, you run up against a more 'predictable' pattern. (Note the word "more" there - it's not hyper-predictable, just more than non-mechanized means.)See, when you're dealing with an actual human dealer, your odds of certain combinations decrease as compared to a computer program.
cornerback42Oct 18, 2007
Geez sorry it was a passing comment. Didn't really research it just kind of said how I felt. I'll look into it.
jazduckOct 19, 2007
For everyone making the wonderfully astute observation that gambling is rigged to the houses favor, while you are correct for most casino games poker is different and being the third time I think I've mentioned this ill try and explain it simply.In poker you do not play against the house. For every pot (game) that is played the house takes a percentage or fee from the winnings, known as a rake. The house does not play poker, it simply hosts the game and is paid for doing so. Now, consider they get paid no matter who wins, the best business model is to increase the number of hands played thus more profit. By cheating or altering odds to benefit an individual (not even the house) they are likely to turn customers away from their site. Good poker players are intelligent and will notice irregularities in play. The poker company will actually lose more from this than anyone involved in the actual tourney, it is definitely not in their interests to cheat you, they want you to keep playing.
centerblackOct 24, 2007
And by the same token, people should stop posting single hands and trying to declare them obvious proof that the guy was cheating.
tcmebNov 12, 2007
Actually, from what I've read at pocketfives.com, their business hasn't been impacted significantly.
tcmebNov 12, 2007
Well, I've read many of the comments posted here, and have two of my own:1. My understanding is that the cheating at Absolute being exposed has NOT signifcantly impacted their business; still going strong.2. With the amount of money involved, It would be incredibly naive to think that this is the first and only instance of cheating of this sort at any poker site. This is just the first to be proven and widely publicized.
ozonew4mMar 11, 2008
Wow this is very disturbing, I play on this site quite often.. Or should i say i used to play on this site, no more after reading this.. thank you<a class="user" href="http://www.poker-blog.us">http://www.poker-blog.us</a>
twoskinzMar 16, 2008
check these games, you can see for yourself what he's doing is impossible without cheating<a class="user" href="http://www.papicasino.com">http://www.papicasino.com</a>
niravtaApr 10, 2008
So what's the bottom line?Cheaters Or not?
dukeofburlJul 17, 2008
I think all of these poker sites need to be watched carefully, but who is going to do this? The government?! Ha<a class="user" href="http://www.marketwithartemis.com">http://www.marketwithartemis.com</a>
timtojDec 30, 2008
I was one of them, but i have to say i was quite happy when it came to my attention that i had been cheated. I got back more that i ever lost on that site, lol.
Closed AccountApr 6, 2009
Read this <a class="user" href="http://www.roomreview.net/play-poker/">http://www.roomreview.net/play-poker/</a> for more info.
kalvSep 12, 2009
very ignorant comment
cultist667Sep 12, 2009
Gambling using an online program without seeing the source code.... Yeah I have trust its not rigged....
goopxx11Oct 21, 2009
well you know what i say it id all bulls**t thay find a way not to pay to a big woining players and thay say he chit no way!it is all basic <a class="user" href="http://www.blackjake.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackjake.net</a>
pokerrichMar 11, 2010
Get PokerRich.<a class="user" href="http://thepokerrich.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thepokerrich.blogspot.com/</a>
haydenhaydenNov 14, 2010
I can't believe this site is still around.
patricia8129Nov 18, 2010
i love playing poker...
bldrNov 30, 2010
now that's something you don't see every day
guitruMar 15, 2011
This is very sad news, and very bad publicity for the online poker industry... http://1800playpoker.com/
Harry_Dorcas_OnlyJun 6, 2011
So what are the authorities doing about it? Is this one reason they had to indict a lot of online gaming & online poker websites? The fault of one is not the fault of all... I wish they remember that.
wylupekAug 17, 2011
http://www.poker-pokersites.com