torrentfreak.com — Only a few weeks ago, a University of Washington study showed showed how inaccurate the MPAA and RIAA’s evidence gathering techniques are. Now, instead of improving their pirate chasing tactics, the MPAA simply claims they don’t need any evidence to bankrupt “alleged” copyright infringers.
Jun 21, 2008 View in Crawl 4
combatJun 21, 2008
seconded
mustangmattJun 22, 2008
What's so totally special about them?...
instagoJun 22, 2008
F**KING THING SUCKS!
anubis2nightJun 22, 2008
one class action lawsuit will stop them in their tracks lets find a lawyer with some balls and get this thing done...
rockstarhourJun 23, 2008
Bah! I give up. I know the story is about important stuff, but it's hard to get past the fact the poster misspells "prove" three times. Prove, not "proove" or "proof" in the incorrect context, OK? Geez.
rattelerJun 23, 2008
You mean f**king Terrorists.Using fear to get your way over a large number of people is called Terrorism.Extortion is simple a tool to cause fear in this case.
braininaboxJun 23, 2008
Yes stealing is obviously wrong.However, a traditional viewpoint of artisanry is not:Art, including music, paintings, and videos, is inherently free and cannot be "stolen". However people can choose to reimburse a specific artist if they choose as an act of respect and admiration. For example, the DVD's that I buy I could easily download for free. However I choose to purchase them to display my respect and support for a SPECIFIC director/artist.
shinkouJun 25, 2008
Interesting! By the same reason, they could be accused for violating internet users' privacy. May it be wire tapping, data packet sniffing, system break-in, you name it! It is very difficult, if not impossible, to provide such direct proof when confronting those kind of privacy violation activities. ;)
fuzzybeardJun 30, 2008
Arrrrharrharr!