dailymotion.com — MIT Engineer Jeff King presents the evidence that the WTC towers were brought down by a controlled demolition using pre-planted explosives, directly implying that 9/11 was an inside job. This speech was filmed in 2004, 2 years before Dr. Steven Jones proved that the mechanism used to cut the steel beams of the WTC was thermate cutter charges.
Mar 8, 2007 View in Crawl 4
xtmno3Mar 9, 2007
Two posts about 9/11 being an inside job near each other in the upcoming stories section yet you can't figure out to post these in the VIDEOS SECTION. The beauty is you don't have to add (video) after your title for people to know what is going to be there when they link.
Closed AccountMar 9, 2007
Beyond that, they can't help lying, lying and more lying. >MIT Engineer Jeff KingBulls**t! Jeff King doesn't teach at MIT -- he's actually a physician! He did get a degree once in electrical engineering (not even civil!) from MIT. I'd like to slap these lying conspiracy theorists.
ichingMar 9, 2007
You are right that he doesn't teach.Jeff King graduated in ‘74 from MIT with a combined BiologyElectrical Engineering major. He then worked for 8 years in electronics and electro-mechanical engineering then got his doctorate.Your degrees are what? I have three myself.Science is science and to most of us that have look at it. .........There are too many unanswered scientific and forensic questions that even a first year science major in college should acknowledge.The time line is one that even a sophomore in high-school shouldn't have trouble finding a discrepancy in what you think you were told and what was really reported but buried out of the front pages and TV news. Most of this is from newspapers that buried the news in some a-21 section but never caught the public eyeJust check it out .......<a class="user" href="http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project">http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project</a>
Closed AccountMar 9, 2007
iching:>Jeff King graduated in ‘74 from MIT with a combined BiologyElectrical Engineering major. He then worked for 8 years in electronics and electro-mechanical engineering then got his doctorate.Yup, he's not a civil engineer, unless they built the WTC out of circuit boards.>Your degrees are what? Specialization in a field, actually. That's what degrees are.>I have three myself.Goody for you, I have a Masters in Information Technology - want to hear my opinions on biology?>Science is science and to most of us that have look at it. Great, give me your knowledge about how RNA degradation affects aging, and then give me your knowledge about motion dynamics of the human body. Come on man, science is science! >.........There are too many unanswered scientific and forensic questions that even a first year science major in college should acknowledge.No, there really aren't. I'll make you a deal, you read screwloosechange which factually destroys your (provably) false opinions, then I'll watch the movie.
waiting2awakeMar 9, 2007
It really always has, and probably always will, boil down to 4 simple words - Who do you trust?From my own perspective, the current admin(and governments in general) lie as a matter of course. They have held up investigations on 911, they have been caught in lie after lie, and they have publically tried to smear anyone that points out any inconsistency in the "official story". In the end, this one act, paved the way for everything they had planned and gave them everything they needed. None of that makes it an inside job - but it does give everyone the right to question the events. Simply stated the "pro-offical story" arguements go something like:"The government wouldn't do that" - Check history, yes they have."The government wouldn't kill their own citizens" - Check history, yes they have."The government couldn't keep this quiet" - They didn't that is why there is still discussion on it."The conspiracy theory's are wacko" - Maybe, but not the point. Regardless if the planes brought down the towers, or explosives brought down the tower, or some butterfly flapping its' wings in japan brought down the towers - simply put, there is enough reason to suspect that the government knew what was about to happen and did nothing to stop it - at worst - they helped it along. That is the real problem here, and until people stop arguing about Mr. Strawman, it won't change.
shedmyskinAug 25, 2008
I have worked with a couple civil engineers who agree the offcicial version is so flawed its a joke. I'm not a civil engineer, but have been working in the industry since 16 years old in the field, surveying and as a drafter as well. I've worked on steel structured buildings, but whatever, I'm not making any claims.The idea that this guy doesnt know what hes talking about so oh well, is a joke. There ARE plenty of structural and civil engineers who have questioned the official version of the story, which IS full of holes.