timeout.com— Revolver have acquired the rights to the hugely successful online film about the 9/11 terrorist attacks.Online film phenomenon 'Loose Change 9/11' has been picked up for theatrical release in the UK.
May 24, 2007View in Crawl 4
@subman697If your going to talk about John Loftus then comment to my post about the "Many highly-qualified legal scholars believe that the horrible attacks of September 1, 2001, may intentionally have been allowed to happen or even been actively aided and abetted by elements within the United States government."You must be unaware that you are now commenting on my post about "Senior Government Officials who work in and or with U.S. Intelligence Services Question the 9/11 Commission Report and many have come to the conclusion that the attacks of 9/11 were, in their essence, an inside job perpetrated at the highest levels of the U S government!"
Herkimer and the other lgf morons will spam every 9/11 conspiracy story on digg. It doesn't matter what you present, they will attack it without reading. I'm not sure why, but they rabidly attack anything remotely resembling the conspiracy theories. They are either psychologically very disturbed individuals who can't tolerate free speech or are being funded to do this by certain agencies. In either case, they have no interest reading or thinking about anything you might present. Here is one example <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Popular_Mechanics_OWNED">http://digg.com/politics/Popular_Mechanics_OWNED</a>
The people responsible for 9-11 are the ones who planted the explosives that turned the WTC intact concrete and glass into a 50 micron sized fine powder in less than 15 seconds.NOBODY has ever discovered a way to turn INTACT concrete, glass, wheat, peanut or any other material in to a 50 micron sized fine powder without either EXPLODING or MILLING or ABRADING the material.NO COMPRESSION FORCE, be it hammer, hydraulic press, or the dropping of the entire weight of a WTC tower, can turn an intact piece of material be it concrete, glass, wheat, or peanut into an appreciable quantity of micron sized powders, because the FORCE has to be applied between two surfaces that are smoother than 50 microns across their faces, and besides most of the material will be ejected from the sides before the faces come within 50 microns of each other anyway!Folks you can try this at home yourself with a hammer, tiny piece of concrete or glass, a concrete sidewalk, and 15 seconds of hammering, and then you will see that you CANNOT make 50 micron sized powder using COMPRESSION FORCE!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives, because the environment of a collapsing WTC COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY PRODUCED A COMPRESSION FORCE that could trap the WTC tower's concrete and glass material between two surfaces that were smooth to within a 50 micron tolerance, because the WTC tower's has no such surfaces yet alone two surfaces with enough area to create the appreciable amount of fine dust that rained down for blocks.!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives, because the environment of a collapsing WTC COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY PRODUCED A MILLING FORCE that could trap the WTC tower's concrete and glass material between mortar and pestle like surfaces and ground them for many minutes, and besides the fine powder was created in less than 15 seconds!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives, because the environment of a collapsing WTC COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY PRODUCED AN ABRADING FORCE that could trap the WTC tower's concrete and glass material between grind stone like surfaces and ground them for many minutes, and besides the fine powder was created in less than 15 seconds!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives BY PROCESS OF ELIMINATION!If ANYBODY come up with a way to make an appreciable quantity of 50 micron sized powders of any material be it concrete, glass, wheat, or peanut, in less than 15 seconds by using COMPRESSION FORCE, you will better hurry up and notify the patent office and the Nobel prize committee!
re: SpaceMonkeyZeroWhen people resort to saying "F* off", it is because they cannot REFUTE what you say!Is the 50 micron sized dust that is 45% silicon in this picture, fantasy?<a class="user" href="http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/streets1.html">http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/streets1.html</a>Are the people who are dying of silicosis from having breathed this dust in, fantasy?Is the FACT that MILLING, ABRADING, and EXPLODING are the only processes that can turn INTACT material into 50 micron sized dust, fantasy?Is the FACT that EXPLODING is the only process that can turn INTACT concrete into 50 micron sized dust in less than 15 seconds, fantasy?Just because your psyche is to "fragile" to handle the truth, or your brain is so "handicapped" to understand that this 50 micron dust is EVIDENCE, does not change reality no matter how many times you tell me to "F* off"!
Look at the evil this administration does!This is HUGE! It's been blacked out in the US. Someone posted a Palast Video in response to one of my post at CBS. I found out about the E-Mails implicating Rove and tried to post them at CBS.They Shut-down all posting over it! No s**t! After a few hours, they reopened the comments section and I found this;"Let them talk, The CIA/NSC/FBI group is sending Roves emails over there already so apparently they don't care if they know.Posted by ToolMangler at 07:46 PM : May 24, 2007<a class="user" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/23/iraq/main2844536.shtml#ccmm">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/23/iraq/main2844536.shtml#ccmm</a>My guess is ToolMangler is one of the Mods and was telling another Mod to reopen the Boards. The MSM didn't want the E-Mail story going public! I have a feeling that this is about to go Ballistic!"Also the same thing happened at ABC do any of you know if this took place with the other MSM sites?In the email intercepted from the Bush campaign, "Subject: caging," written by Griffin himself, making clear that Griffin was not just involved, the but the director of this vote fixing scheme. In several emails Goodling and Griffin complain about ‘that British reporter Palast’ (an American working with BBC London). In a February 5, 2006 email, Griffin gloats to Goodling that "no [US] national media" has picked up Palast’s discovery of the ‘caging’ operation.look at this email exchange about caging involved the now interim U.S. Attorney Tim Griffin of Arkansas. They fired the guy from Arkansas to install the SOB who committed a felony by participating in caging. You can the names and addresses of some of the folks they caged. They knowingly sent those letters to homeless shelters and naval bases. Look at all those people from Jacksonville, Florida. 1792 people on that spreadsheet. It contains a column for when the person received the caging letter. <a class="user" href="http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/">http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/</a> and <a class="user" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregpalast/413062748/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregpalast/413062748/</a>Before I give you the much more "RECENT" stuff this should give you a good warm up.
"They are either psychologically very disturbed individuals who can't tolerate free speech or are being funded to do this by certain agencies."Ahh yes, the typical argument against someone with an opposing viewpoint: they're either intolerant, or paid to oppose. It can NEVER be the case where someone has already examined the evidence and came to the conclusion for themselves and it happens to be opposite of yours.....With "logical" debates like yours, I'm sure you'll go real far in spreading the "truth"...
honestjoeMay 25, 2007
@subman697If your going to talk about John Loftus then comment to my post about the "Many highly-qualified legal scholars believe that the horrible attacks of September 1, 2001, may intentionally have been allowed to happen or even been actively aided and abetted by elements within the United States government."You must be unaware that you are now commenting on my post about "Senior Government Officials who work in and or with U.S. Intelligence Services Question the 9/11 Commission Report and many have come to the conclusion that the attacks of 9/11 were, in their essence, an inside job perpetrated at the highest levels of the U S government!"
osjprMay 25, 2007
Herkimer and the other lgf morons will spam every 9/11 conspiracy story on digg. It doesn't matter what you present, they will attack it without reading. I'm not sure why, but they rabidly attack anything remotely resembling the conspiracy theories. They are either psychologically very disturbed individuals who can't tolerate free speech or are being funded to do this by certain agencies. In either case, they have no interest reading or thinking about anything you might present. Here is one example <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Popular_Mechanics_OWNED">http://digg.com/politics/Popular_Mechanics_OWNED</a>
critthinkerMay 25, 2007
The people responsible for 9-11 are the ones who planted the explosives that turned the WTC intact concrete and glass into a 50 micron sized fine powder in less than 15 seconds.NOBODY has ever discovered a way to turn INTACT concrete, glass, wheat, peanut or any other material in to a 50 micron sized fine powder without either EXPLODING or MILLING or ABRADING the material.NO COMPRESSION FORCE, be it hammer, hydraulic press, or the dropping of the entire weight of a WTC tower, can turn an intact piece of material be it concrete, glass, wheat, or peanut into an appreciable quantity of micron sized powders, because the FORCE has to be applied between two surfaces that are smoother than 50 microns across their faces, and besides most of the material will be ejected from the sides before the faces come within 50 microns of each other anyway!Folks you can try this at home yourself with a hammer, tiny piece of concrete or glass, a concrete sidewalk, and 15 seconds of hammering, and then you will see that you CANNOT make 50 micron sized powder using COMPRESSION FORCE!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives, because the environment of a collapsing WTC COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY PRODUCED A COMPRESSION FORCE that could trap the WTC tower's concrete and glass material between two surfaces that were smooth to within a 50 micron tolerance, because the WTC tower's has no such surfaces yet alone two surfaces with enough area to create the appreciable amount of fine dust that rained down for blocks.!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives, because the environment of a collapsing WTC COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY PRODUCED A MILLING FORCE that could trap the WTC tower's concrete and glass material between mortar and pestle like surfaces and ground them for many minutes, and besides the fine powder was created in less than 15 seconds!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives, because the environment of a collapsing WTC COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY PRODUCED AN ABRADING FORCE that could trap the WTC tower's concrete and glass material between grind stone like surfaces and ground them for many minutes, and besides the fine powder was created in less than 15 seconds!This is IRREFUTABLE PROOF of use of explosives BY PROCESS OF ELIMINATION!If ANYBODY come up with a way to make an appreciable quantity of 50 micron sized powders of any material be it concrete, glass, wheat, or peanut, in less than 15 seconds by using COMPRESSION FORCE, you will better hurry up and notify the patent office and the Nobel prize committee!
Closed AccountMay 25, 2007
Be aware that Osjpr is a paranoid loon with delusions of persecution.
critthinkerMay 25, 2007
re: SpaceMonkeyZeroWhen people resort to saying "F* off", it is because they cannot REFUTE what you say!Is the 50 micron sized dust that is 45% silicon in this picture, fantasy?<a class="user" href="http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/streets1.html">http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/streets1.html</a>Are the people who are dying of silicosis from having breathed this dust in, fantasy?Is the FACT that MILLING, ABRADING, and EXPLODING are the only processes that can turn INTACT material into 50 micron sized dust, fantasy?Is the FACT that EXPLODING is the only process that can turn INTACT concrete into 50 micron sized dust in less than 15 seconds, fantasy?Just because your psyche is to "fragile" to handle the truth, or your brain is so "handicapped" to understand that this 50 micron dust is EVIDENCE, does not change reality no matter how many times you tell me to "F* off"!
honestjoeMay 25, 2007
Look at the evil this administration does!This is HUGE! It's been blacked out in the US. Someone posted a Palast Video in response to one of my post at CBS. I found out about the E-Mails implicating Rove and tried to post them at CBS.They Shut-down all posting over it! No s**t! After a few hours, they reopened the comments section and I found this;"Let them talk, The CIA/NSC/FBI group is sending Roves emails over there already so apparently they don't care if they know.Posted by ToolMangler at 07:46 PM : May 24, 2007<a class="user" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/23/iraq/main2844536.shtml#ccmm">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/23/iraq/main2844536.shtml#ccmm</a>My guess is ToolMangler is one of the Mods and was telling another Mod to reopen the Boards. The MSM didn't want the E-Mail story going public! I have a feeling that this is about to go Ballistic!"Also the same thing happened at ABC do any of you know if this took place with the other MSM sites?In the email intercepted from the Bush campaign, "Subject: caging," written by Griffin himself, making clear that Griffin was not just involved, the but the director of this vote fixing scheme. In several emails Goodling and Griffin complain about ‘that British reporter Palast’ (an American working with BBC London). In a February 5, 2006 email, Griffin gloats to Goodling that "no [US] national media" has picked up Palast’s discovery of the ‘caging’ operation.look at this email exchange about caging involved the now interim U.S. Attorney Tim Griffin of Arkansas. They fired the guy from Arkansas to install the SOB who committed a felony by participating in caging. You can the names and addresses of some of the folks they caged. They knowingly sent those letters to homeless shelters and naval bases. Look at all those people from Jacksonville, Florida. 1792 people on that spreadsheet. It contains a column for when the person received the caging letter. <a class="user" href="http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/">http://2004.georgewbush.org/deadletteroffice/</a> and <a class="user" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregpalast/413062748/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregpalast/413062748/</a>Before I give you the much more "RECENT" stuff this should give you a good warm up.
tubatechnoJun 12, 2007
"They are either psychologically very disturbed individuals who can't tolerate free speech or are being funded to do this by certain agencies."Ahh yes, the typical argument against someone with an opposing viewpoint: they're either intolerant, or paid to oppose. It can NEVER be the case where someone has already examined the evidence and came to the conclusion for themselves and it happens to be opposite of yours.....With "logical" debates like yours, I'm sure you'll go real far in spreading the "truth"...