jonesreport.com — Loose Change 2 will shown on Virgin Atlantic flights during the month of May 2007. This incredible (and ironic) development has surfaced via email and on 911Blogger. It is reported on Mercury Media, who distribute media to various networks, studios and airlines, as the first of such airlines to purchase the hit documentary for in-air performance.
May 1, 2007 View in Crawl 4
helodermaMay 2, 2007
I would love to be on a flight with this showing, so it could break the ice for debate. So many people are totally unaware that a 3rd building collapsed ( at free-fall speed) that day let alone all the "drill" anomalies, insider trading, explosions, Silverstein insurance scam etc. etc.
lgfalbatrossMay 2, 2007
Spit. First they take away the meal... now they shove lame conspiracy theories at the passengers. Now THAT'S servicing your customers!
justavianMay 2, 2007
Hopefully they'll also distribute the Viewer Guide as well - the one that goes scene by scene and debunks the entire movie. It's a travesty that an airline would agree to show such a disgusting film.For those of you who are not familiar with the guide i mention...<a class="user" href="http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html">http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html</a>
kameelyunMay 2, 2007
This is amazing courage. Thank you so much, Virgin Atlantic!!
swrostmoreMay 2, 2007
What the f...The only explanation I can think of is, Virgin Atlantic doesn't wan't their passengers to be frightened of hijacking, so they are showing a film that implies that the 9/11 hijackings never happened. Now that I think about it, the airline industry took a HUGE hit after 9/11, so I guess it really is in their interest to play up denials.
jtopMay 2, 2007
False flag terror to incite wars is a PROVEN FACT. " a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact dublicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At the designated time the duplicate would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone." pg. 13<a class="user" href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf">http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf</a>" c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a submarine or small aircraft would disperse parts, parachute, etc, at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots heading to Homestead would have a true story so far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft would be dispatched and parts of aircraft found." pg. 14If they would trick us back then, why wouldn't they do it now?
nakedtruthMay 2, 2007
You call a poorly written hack job a "guide"? This is nothing but a bunch of stupid straw man arguments. For example the "guide" tries to make hay out of LooseChange pointing out that OBL denied involvement in 9/11. Well the OFFICIAL STORY is that OBL claimed responsibility. Yet this is based off of tapes that were obviously fabricated. So it raises the question 1) why fabricate a confession and 2) if OBL confession is the main evidence and that was fake than what real evidence does the official story have? The FBI doesn't have 9/11 on OBL's wanted poster because they (the FBI) says the evidence to prove he was involved doesn't exist. So it's not about "believing the terrorists" but rather quoting the FBI.<a class="user" href="http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm">http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm</a><a class="user" href="http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html">http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html</a>Also note E. Howard Hunts deathbed confession about the JFK assassination. So for all of the yahoos that claim a "massive conspiracy can't be covered up for years"...well you've been proven wrong.<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/political_opinion/JFK_Murder_Plot">http://digg.com/political_opinion/JFK_Murder_Plot</a>