linuxjournal.com— The really good news is that now Linux can finally take over the world, and most people won't even notice!
May 28, 2008View in Crawl 4
Dugg down for presuming you know what sdl486 was thinking. I agree with him that this article was incoherent. "I know, this sounds negative about Linux so a bunch of you will get your panties in a knot and will have knee-jerk reaction Digg me down but I'm not being negative about Linux -- the amazing thing is, that's kind of what this article is talking about so maybe finally someone in the Linux community has come to this incredibly important (One of the most important) realisation"What? The article is talking about circle jerking and panties in knots? This sentence is hardly coherent. No wonder you thought the article consistent and understandable.
My goodness, are you illiterate? I was obviously talking about my comment sounding negative. Some of the parts like ".. but ** I'm ** not being .." kind of give it away.
Because windows is not stable, every person I know that isn't a computer nut is running windows and it runs like f**kING s**t. Their system is bogged down to hell and back with bulls**tware. Also because it's closed source you'll never know if XP of Vista has a back door for the USA government as windows 2000 did. Also while the guts have changed over the year to try to make it more stable, the GUI and basic idea of windows hasn't changed scene win95. Put these things together and I would say that MS doesn't work for their money any more and therefore we should stop giving them any money at all. The whole world could be rid of windows and the world would be a better place because of it. I care about people, there for I don't want anyone useing windows.
"If they don't notice, what's the point of switching?"Because it's free and open? If no one switches, no one will calculate Linux and Linux will stay forever where it is.Besides, there are more groups involved than only the users. For example administrators. They certainly have an easier job. Less spyware/virus problems etc.I completely agree with you however that once you got a system running it's not always worth the effort to change, but then again: as long as you do not have a choice for which OS you would like, "linux fanbois" like me will continue spamming pro-linux articles in the Linux-angle of Digg. I'm sorry if that bothers you....
yodaj007May 29, 2008
Why is it funny your aunt made that comment? Anyone can tell that a system is crashing less.
yodaj007May 29, 2008
Dugg down for presuming you know what sdl486 was thinking. I agree with him that this article was incoherent. "I know, this sounds negative about Linux so a bunch of you will get your panties in a knot and will have knee-jerk reaction Digg me down but I'm not being negative about Linux -- the amazing thing is, that's kind of what this article is talking about so maybe finally someone in the Linux community has come to this incredibly important (One of the most important) realisation"What? The article is talking about circle jerking and panties in knots? This sentence is hardly coherent. No wonder you thought the article consistent and understandable.
estvirMay 29, 2008
My goodness, are you illiterate? I was obviously talking about my comment sounding negative. Some of the parts like ".. but ** I'm ** not being .." kind of give it away.
badassninjaMay 29, 2008
Because windows is not stable, every person I know that isn't a computer nut is running windows and it runs like f**kING s**t. Their system is bogged down to hell and back with bulls**tware. Also because it's closed source you'll never know if XP of Vista has a back door for the USA government as windows 2000 did. Also while the guts have changed over the year to try to make it more stable, the GUI and basic idea of windows hasn't changed scene win95. Put these things together and I would say that MS doesn't work for their money any more and therefore we should stop giving them any money at all. The whole world could be rid of windows and the world would be a better place because of it. I care about people, there for I don't want anyone useing windows.
mckooikerMay 29, 2008
"If they don't notice, what's the point of switching?"Because it's free and open? If no one switches, no one will calculate Linux and Linux will stay forever where it is.Besides, there are more groups involved than only the users. For example administrators. They certainly have an easier job. Less spyware/virus problems etc.I completely agree with you however that once you got a system running it's not always worth the effort to change, but then again: as long as you do not have a choice for which OS you would like, "linux fanbois" like me will continue spamming pro-linux articles in the Linux-angle of Digg. I'm sorry if that bothers you....