blogs.abcnews.com — "This guy had to be a liberal. You start railing against the rich and all this other -- this guy's a liberal. He was turned into a liberal somewhere along the line. So it's a liberal that committed this act," Rush Limbaugh said. "I'm just pointing out a fact."
Apr 24, 2007 View in Crawl 4
davedufourApr 25, 2007
You have no idea whether he was plaming anyone or not. Limbaugh was just stating a fact -- Cho was definitely on the left. How is there any doubt about that? Since when is stating a fact bigoted? Nice name-calling, by the way. Proves where your thought processes are.
infectaphibianApr 25, 2007
He was obviously a married gay pro choice liberal atheist video game player.(Is everyone happy now....?)
glsmythApr 25, 2007
Does anyone still listen to this guy?
dethdelrApr 25, 2007
Another article out of context. He said that specifically to see how long it would take for the media to post it. Look at TMACH's post above.. You can hate Rush all you want but there's a reason he's the #1 talk show personality. 99% of you that hate him have never even listened to his show.. I guess it's easier to just call someone a "Fat Idiot" then actually take the time to listen to him and make an informed opinion.
pfhreakApr 25, 2007
"And how the f**k does believing in Jesus Christ make a difference?"Because the perceived lack of Christian morals in his victims was a major reason cited by Cho in his video for why he did what he did. I'm not bad-mouthing Christians, just pointing out that there was a lot more going on his head than just hatred of the rich and materialism. Limbaugh is cherry-picking elements of Cho's motivation that can he can twist into an attack on the left, and ignoring the elements that ring of the Religious Right.Cho was just unbalanced, and what he did had nothing to do with his political views. We don't even know what his political views were or if he was even political. Using this incident as a political tool is reprehensible.
pfhreakApr 25, 2007
Son of a... I forgot to hit "reply" again! This is in responce to ArntorFTL:"Cho may have been a liberal (by Rush's account) but it was conservatives that allowed the gun to be put into his hands. Who shoulders more of the blame?"I'm pretty liberal, and I'm going to have to answer your question with: "Cho, Cho shoulders more of the blame." Trying to turn this into an attack on pro-gun ownership conservatives is just as bad as Limbaugh's cherry-picking of Cho's statements and twisting them into an attack on liberals.
cnorris1Apr 25, 2007
Q: This guy commits character assassination for a living and is a drug addict, and stays on the air, yet Don Imus makes a ill-conceived racial remark and we crucify him. Where has the sense gone in this nation ?A: Imus has higher ratings
incognitoApr 25, 2007
Yes Rush go back to your corner now
meowbiusfoxApr 26, 2007
E's a Ham arm with nothing vitally important to say.There,.I feel better now.