thinkprogress.org — Yesterday, Sen. Lieberman said that Bush "will be judged as a president who saw the threat, and in the midst of an unpopular war, he stuck with it. And so I think overall, over time, his ratings among the historians will be greater than his ratings in the polls today."
Jul 13, 2007 View in Crawl 4
reed311Jul 14, 2007
No, it was actually because he lost in the primary and didn't want to lose his seat. He's a scumbag politician.
udahlenJul 15, 2007
Lieberman is delusional. Sad that he isn't alone.
opiniastrousJul 15, 2007
Honestly, I think that in this day and age, with huge amounts of information flowing around the world in terms of books published, news articles written, studies performed and opinions tallied, history is written today.Tomorrow there will be very little need for historians to research the issue of Bush's presidency and write the history of it - it has already been done for them.
sertoriusJul 15, 2007
Lieberman is one of the reasons why this country is on a precipitous decline to oblivion--Bush is another.
craftycornerJul 16, 2007
Like most politicians, Lieberman was corrupted along the way I'm sure. I really wonder, maybe Bush has him by the short hairs somehow...
craftycornerJul 16, 2007
When trying to separate the actions of the nation of Israel from the Jewish people, sometimes it's not easy to find the correct terms. Is Zionist the correct term for the Israeli state?
beaumacJul 16, 2007
This guy is from another planet. Way to go Connecticut!! Idiots